Dynamic Glaucoma Data Resampling for Medical Relevance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Patient-acquired data for glaucoma management is often incomplete or inadequate, leading to challenges for healthcare providers in making informed decisions, resulting in trial-and-error approaches to patient care, increased suffering, and elevated costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that selectively provides feedback by determining the medical meaningfulness of glaucoma data, requesting additional data when necessary, and analyzing it using a pretrained model to offer treatment recommendations, thereby improving data quality and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If patient-acquired data is collected continuously, then data quantity increases, but data quality and medical meaningfulness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quantityVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts data sampling frequency based on medical relevance. Instead of continuous or fixed-interval sampling, the system adapts the sampling rate according to the clinical significance of different time points, ensuring higher quality data collection when medically necessary while reducing unnecessary sampling otherwise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the sampling parameter (time interval) based on medical relevance. By evaluating whether a data point is medically meaningful and adjusting the sampling interval accordingly, the system optimizes both data quantity and quality, collecting sufficient data without overwhelming the system with irrelevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If data sampling frequency is increased, then data completeness improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from medical relevance evaluation to control data sampling. By assessing whether collected data points are medically meaningful and using this feedback to guide subsequent sampling decisions, the system achieves reliable data collection without requiring complex continuous monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-evaluation of data medical relevance and automatically adjusts its own sampling strategy. This self-service capability allows the system to optimize data completeness while managing its own complexity without requiring external intervention or overly complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If more data is collected, then analysis accuracy improves, but data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the medically relevant data points from the continuous stream of patient-acquired data. By filtering out irrelevant information and keeping only the essential data points for analysis, the system maintains high analysis accuracy while significantly reducing the total data volume that requires processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all collected data, the system applies partial action by focusing analysis only on the medically relevant subset of data. This approach achieves sufficient analysis accuracy for clinical decision-making without the computational burden of processing every single data point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240105342A1Dynamic data resampling based on medical relevance
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 EYE TO EYE TELEHEALTH INC
  • US20240105342A1 patent drawing
  • US20240105342A1 patent drawing
  • US20240105342A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system that provides feedback regarding a set of data is described. Notably, the computer system may determine whether the set of data is medically meaningful. For example, the set of data may include intraocular pressure measurements during a time interval. When the measurements are at incorrect times of day (such as relative to a treatment time), the set of data may not be medically meaningful. When the set of data is not medically meaningful, the computer system may provide a request for additional data, such as a different type of data, a different sampling time for the additional data, etc. Otherwise, when the set of data is medically meaningful, the computer system may analyze the set of data to determine analysis results, and then may selectively provide feedback associated with glaucoma of the patient or treatment of the patient based at least in part on the analysis results.