Dynamic Communication Group Management via Relevancy Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional systems for managing communication groups on social networking platforms lack effective user data validation and relevance-based group recommendations, often resulting in poor quality groups with members who do not align with the group's objectives.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine user relevance by comparing user profiles with pre-defined group objectives, generating a relevancy score, and recommending groups based on this score, while automatically removing users who fail to meet pre-determined thresholds over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual user data validation is implemented for joining communication groups, then group quality is improved, but system complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroup qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates user profiles against group objectives using algorithms that compute relevancy scores, eliminating the need for manual moderators. The system serves itself by autonomously making inclusion/exclusion decisions based on predefined criteria, thereby maintaining group quality without increasing operational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual screening processes are replaced with automated computational evaluation systems that compare user profile parameters against group objective parameters. This substitution of mechanical human review with algorithmic processing reduces system complexity while maintaining or improving validation consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If open group policies are adopted allowing everyone to join, then ease of operation is improved, but group quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of joiningVSAvoidgroup quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of user profiles against group objectives before allowing joining. By pre-computing relevancy scores and comparing user parameters with group criteria in advance, the system ensures that only relevant users are recommended or accepted into groups, maintaining quality while automating the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms where user participation and group performance are continuously monitored. This feedback loop allows the system to refine relevancy scoring and adjust group recommendations, ensuring that open policies do not compromise group quality through continuous optimization based on observed outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If large numbers of groups are recommended to users without profile analysis, then productivity is improved, but recommendation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of recommendationsVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting relevancy score thresholds and weighting factors based on user profiles and group characteristics. By modifying evaluation parameters rather than simply increasing recommendation volume, the system maintains high accuracy while being productive in connecting users with relevant groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system is dynamic, continuously adapting to user behavior, profile changes, and group performance metrics. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize recommendation accuracy over time while maintaining high productivity through automated, real-time personalization of group suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10687180B2System and method for dynamically managing communication groups
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 INZANE LABS PTE LTD
  • US10687180B2 patent drawing
  • US10687180B2 patent drawing
  • US10687180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method and system for dynamically managing one or more communication groups. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the method comprises the steps of, determining one or more parameters associated with a user profile of a user subscribed to the dedicated networking platform, determining one or more pre-defined objectives associated with the one or more communication groups, evaluating the user to determine relevance with the one or more pre-defined objectives associated with the one or more communication groups, wherein evaluating comprises generating a relevancy score and recommending the one or more communication groups to the user based on the relevancy score.