Dynamic Threshold Hazard Alarm for Fire Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hazard alarm systems often trigger false alarms due to nuisance events such as burnt food or hairspray, leading to unnecessary alerts and user dissatisfaction, while failing to promptly detect real fire hazards.

Innovation Solution

A hazard safety device equipped with smoke, temperature, and carbon monoxide sensors, coupled with a processor that uses computer learning techniques to differentiate between dangerous fires and nuisance events by adjusting sensor thresholds based on signal rates and ambient conditions, implementing state diagrams to accurately classify sensor data and issue alarms only when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the smoke sensor threshold is set low to detect real fire hazards quickly, then detection speed is improved, but false alarms increase due to nuisance events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the alarm threshold variable rather than fixed. The processor dynamically adjusts the smoke sensor threshold based on real-time temperature readings and rate-of-change calculations. When temperature rises rapidly (indicating real fire), the threshold lowers to enable quick detection. When temperature is stable (indicating nuisance events like cooking), the threshold raises to prevent false alarms. This dynamic threshold adjustment resolves the contradiction between fast detection and false alarm reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of the alarm threshold from a static value to a dynamic value that varies based on temperature conditions. By monitoring temperature and its rate of change, the system adjusts the smoke detection threshold parameter in real-time. This parameter change allows the system to maintain high sensitivity during actual fires while reducing sensitivity during nuisance events, thereby resolving the contradiction between detection speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the alarm threshold is set high to reduce false alarms, then false alarm rate decreases, but detection speed slows down for real fire hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoiddetection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic threshold adjustment based on temperature conditions. When the temperature sensor detects rapid temperature increase (a key indicator of real fire), the processor automatically lowers the smoke alarm threshold, enabling fast detection. When temperature is stable or rising slowly (typical of nuisance events), the threshold remains high to prevent false alarms. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction by adapting the threshold to the actual fire risk level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring temperature and using it to adjust the smoke alarm threshold. The temperature sensor provides feedback about environmental conditions, and the processor uses this feedback to modulate the alarm sensitivity. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the threshold is appropriately adjusted based on real-time conditions, resolving the contradiction between high threshold (fewer false alarms) and low threshold (faster detection).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and processing algorithms are added to differentiate fire from nuisance events, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by using a single microprocessor to perform multiple tasks: reading smoke sensor data, reading temperature sensor data, calculating rate of change, comparing against thresholds, and controlling the alarm output. Rather than adding separate dedicated circuits for each function, the processor handles all detection and decision-making logic, improving accuracy without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the smoke detection function and temperature monitoring function into a unified detection system. The processor combines data from both sensors and uses their relationship (temperature rate of change combined with smoke levels) to make alarm decisions. This merging allows the system to achieve higher detection accuracy through multi-parameter analysis while avoiding the complexity of completely separate detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9330550B2Low nuisance fast response hazard alarm
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 KIDDE WALTER PORTABLE EQUIPMENT INC
  • US9330550B2 patent drawing
  • US9330550B2 patent drawing
  • US9330550B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to systems for, and methods of, providing low nuisance, fast response hazard notification. Advantageously, the disclosed techniques avoid sounding an alarm in response to typical nuisance events, such as burnt food.