Dynamic Heating Control for Material Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing material deposition processes require constant speed, orientation, and heat output of the heating means to ensure stable weld quality, limiting flexibility and efficiency in achieving complex geometries and leading to potential material wastage and inconsistent microstructures.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that allow adjustable power output, stand off, orientation, speed, and direction of travel of the heating means, along with adjustable powder delivery rates, using a lookup table to determine optimal parameters for each geometric feature, enabling precise control of heat delivery and distribution during the material deposition process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If constant speed, orientation, and heat output of the heating means are maintained to ensure stable weld quality, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld quality consistencyVSAvoidflexibility for complex geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of heating means parameters (power output, speed, orientation, stand-off distance) based on real-time process conditions and geometric features. The system transitions from static constant parameters to dynamic variable parameters, allowing adaptation to complex geometries while maintaining weld quality through controlled variation of process parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters of the heating means (power, speed, orientation, position) during the deposition process. By varying these parameters according to the geometric features being deposited, the system achieves both adaptability to complex shapes and consistency in weld quality through optimized parameter combinations for each specific feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If constant parameters are used for the heating means to ensure stable deposition process, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic parameter adjustment rather than static constants, optimizing the deposition process for each geometric feature. This allows faster deposition speeds in suitable regions while maintaining precision requirements only where necessary, thereby improving overall productivity without sacrificing critical quality attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By varying power output, travel speed, and other parameters according to the specific requirements of different geometric features, the system achieves efficient deposition where high speed is acceptable and maintains precision where required, optimizing the balance between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If adjustable parameters are used for the heating means to achieve complex geometries, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability for complex geometriesVSAvoidmicrostructure consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements controlled parameter variations within optimized ranges rather than arbitrary adjustments. By establishing parameter boundaries and optimization criteria for different geometric features, the system achieves adaptability to complex shapes while maintaining microstructure consistency through scientifically determined parameter combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates monitoring and control mechanisms that provide feedback on deposition quality and process conditions. This feedback enables real-time adjustment of parameters to maintain precision even when adapting to complex geometries, ensuring that microstructure consistency is preserved throughout the variable deposition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If high power output is used to increase deposition rate, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to excessive heat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition rateVSAvoidheat control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic or pulsed heating patterns rather than continuous high power application. By cycling the power output between high and low states or using pulsed sequences, the system achieves higher average deposition rates while preventing excessive heat accumulation that would compromise manufacturing precision and microstructure quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts power output in real-time based on process conditions, material properties, and geometric requirements. This dynamic control allows the system to apply high power when conditions permit (maintaining productivity) while reducing power when heat accumulation becomes excessive (maintaining precision), optimizing the balance between deposition rate and heat control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the construction of components with complex geometries, reduces material wastage, and achieves more consistent microstructures by precisely tuning the temperature and heat application, resulting in improved thermal management and deposition efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a heating means (for example, a laser) is passed over a substrate, bringing a region of the substrate to a molten state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

Powdered material is delivered to the molten region, brought to a molten state, and then cooled such that it solidifies and creates a solid structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial deposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP2377641B1Method and apparatus for Manufacturing a Component
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • EP2377641B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2377641B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP2377641B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A method and an apparatus for manufacturing a component (18). The method includes the steps of heating a working region (20) of a substrate (18) with a heating means (12); directing a material (24) into the working region (20) to bring the material (24) into a temporary molten state, and depositing said material (24) on the substrate (18) such that when the material solidifies it forms at least part of the component. The heating means power output, stand off, orientation, speed and direction of travel relative to the substrate are adjustable and controlled throughout the material deposition process to control the shape and/or size of the working region to thereby control the distribution and rate of heat delivery to the substrate.