Dynamic Hemodynamic Assessment for Volume Status Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining volume status in patients are suboptimal, with traditional static measures like central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure being unreliable, and dynamic techniques like pulse pressure variation being limited to specific patient populations and cumbersome to implement.

Innovation Solution

A temporarily placed device that measures and induces perturbations in intra-cardiac filling pressures and heart rate to determine optimal volume status, combining invasive sensor data with computational analyses to guide heart rate and filling pressure adjustments, and potentially induce tricuspid regurgitation to optimize cardiac output and prevent pulmonary pressure elevation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional static measures (CVP, PAOP) are used to determine volume status, then the method is simple and widely applicable, but the measurement precision and reliability are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume status assessment accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static volume status assessment (CVP, PAOP) to dynamic assessment by measuring changes in these parameters in response to fluid challenges or respiratory maneuvers. This dynamic approach captures the heart's response to volume changes, providing more accurate prediction of volume responsiveness while using the same basic monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic fluid challenges or respiratory maneuvers to elicit measurable changes in cardiac parameters. By applying periodic perturbations and measuring the resulting oscillations in CVP, PAOP, or pulse pressure, the system can calculate volume responsiveness without requiring continuous complex monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If dynamic techniques (pulse pressure variation) are used to improve volume status assessment, then measurement precision improves, but the ease of operation and applicability worsen due to patient requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume responsiveness prediction accuracyVSAvoidpatient population applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a unified approach that can determine volume responsiveness across different patient populations by measuring the heart's intrinsic response to standardized challenges. The system adapts the assessment method based on patient condition, using fluid challenges for some patients and respiratory maneuvers for others, making the technique universally applicable while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system measures changes in multiple hemodynamic parameters (CVP, PAOP, pulse pressure, stroke volume) in response to controlled perturbations. By analyzing the magnitude and pattern of these parameter changes, the system can assess volume responsiveness regardless of the specific patient population, adapting to different physiological states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fluid boluses are administered to improve cardiac output in hypovolemic patients, then cardiac output may improve, but harmful factors increase due to potential volume overload and reduced renal perfusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecardiac output improvement reliabilityVSAvoidvolume overload and renal perfusion reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of volume responsiveness before administering fluid boluses by measuring the heart's response to small fluid challenges or respiratory maneuvers. This preliminary action identifies patients who are likely to respond to volume resuscitation, allowing clinicians to administer fluids only when beneficial and avoid harmful volume overload in non-responders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback on volume status and predicted response to fluid administration. By continuously monitoring hemodynamic parameters and comparing them against predicted responses, the system guides fluid management decisions, adjusting therapy based on the patient's actual response rather than fixed protocols, thereby improving reliability while minimizing harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10987058B2Apparatus and methods for optimizing volume status and cardiac output
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 CARDIOFLOW TECH
  • US10987058B2 patent drawing
  • US10987058B2 patent drawing
  • US10987058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for optimizing hemodynamics within a patient. Specifically, the system incorporates invasive sensor data (e.g., pressure measurements) combined with mechanisms to dynamically change the loading conditions of the heart and/or heart rate, in order to understand hemodynamic parameters. Computational analyses on dynamic sensor data are used to understand and guide heart rate, filling pressures, and/or volume resuscitation in critically ill patients. By pacing the heart or inducing tricuspid regurgitation, the system may cause dynamic changes in sensor data to understand optimal loading conditions and heart rates. While determining optimal hemodynamic parameters, the system may then automatically optimize the heart rate and/or filling pressures in critically ill patients.