Dynamic Cooking Hob Zone Assignment via Shared Heating Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hob devices lack flexibility and comfort in accommodating various cooking utensils, particularly those with larger diameters or irregular shapes, as they often require fixed heating zones and additional heating elements that increase complexity and energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A hob device with at least two variable cooking surface areas defined by multiple heating elements, an additional heating element positioned between them, and a control unit that dynamically assigns the additional heating element to either surface area based on operating parameters, allowing for flexible configuration and efficient energy use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed heating zones are used, then the device structure is simple, but the adaptability to different cooking utensils is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different cooking utensilsVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating zones are made dynamically configurable through software control rather than fixed physically. The control unit can define different heating zones by selecting and activating specific heating elements from the available array, allowing the cooking surface to adapt to various utensil sizes and positions without physical reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The heating element array serves multiple functions by being able to form different heating zone configurations. The same physical heating elements can be grouped differently to create various heating patterns, making the device universally applicable to different cooking needs without requiring separate dedicated zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional heating elements are added to accommodate larger utensils, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of larger utensilsVSAvoidnumber of heating elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking surface is segmented into multiple individual heating elements arranged in rows, allowing selective activation of only the elements needed for the current cooking task. This segmentation enables the system to accommodate larger utensils by activating more elements without requiring all elements to be permanently configured as fixed zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system activates only the necessary subset of heating elements required for the current cooking vessel size and position, rather than activating entire fixed zones. This partial action approach provides the flexibility to accommodate larger utensils by activating additional elements when needed, while avoiding the energy waste and complexity of permanently configuring all possible zone combinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Power

If more heating elements are installed, then the heating capacity increases, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating capacityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit activates only the specific heating elements needed for the current cooking task based on the size and position of the cooking vessel. This allows the system to provide high heating capacity when large utensils are used by activating more elements, while consuming less energy when smaller utensils are used by activating fewer elements, thus avoiding continuous high energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If variable cooking surface areas are implemented, then the flexibility improves, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of cooking surfaceVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking surface configuration is made dynamic through software-based zone definition rather than fixed physical boundaries. The control unit can dynamically assign heating elements to different cooking zones based on real-time detection of cooking vessel position and size, providing flexibility without complex mechanical or physical reconfiguration systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses detection means to sense the position and characteristics of cooking vessels on the surface, then uses this feedback information to automatically configure the appropriate heating zones and activate the necessary heating elements. This feedback loop simplifies the control system by using automated detection and response rather than requiring complex manual control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances operator comfort and flexibility by allowing for the efficient heating of larger or irregularly shaped utensils without significantly increasing the number of heating elements, while ensuring even heat distribution and energy savings.

Implementation Method 1

the induction heating element is designed to convert electrical energy into an alternating magnetic field, which is intended to induce eddy currents and/or remagnetization effects in a metallic, preferably at least partially ferromagnetic, cooking vessel, which are then converted into heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the induction heating element is designed to convert electrical energy into an alternating magnetic field, which is intended to induce eddy currents and/or remagnetization effects in a metallic, preferably at least partially ferromagnetic, cooking vessel, which are then converted into heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

In particular, the heating element is designed as an induction heating element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction heating: Induction Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3028539B1Cooking hob devide
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 BOSCH SIEMENS HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP3028539B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3028539B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The problem addressed by the invention is that of providing a generic device having improved characteristics with regard to a high level of convenience for an operator and/or substantial flexibility. This problem is solved by providing a cooking hob device (10), in particular an induction cooking hob device, having at least two variable cooking surface areas (12, 14) which are each fixed by an arrangement of at least two heating elements (16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30), and having at least one further heating element (32) which is disposed between the variable cooking surface areas (12, 14), and having at least one control unit (34) which is provided in order to assign the further heating element (32) as a function of at least one operating parameter to at least one of the variable cooking surface areas (12, 14) and to output at least one assignment of the further heating element (32) to at least one of the variable cooking surface area (12, 14) by means of at least one output unit (36).