Dynamic Identity Disclosure in Communication Sessions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems do not allow users to control the disclosure of their identities during shared content sessions, leading to inefficiencies and redundant resource usage, as users may feel uncomfortable revealing their identity, resulting in reduced participation and increased computing resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that enables users to control the disclosure of their identities through different modes of operation, such as anonymous or attributed content sharing, within a single user interface, allowing users to choose when and to whom their identity is revealed, and using a server to manage the display of identities based on user instructions or triggering conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users share their identity with all participants in a communication session, then trust and accountability are improved, but user comfort and participation are reduced due to discomfort in certain circumstances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust and accountabilityVSAvoiduser comfort and participation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts identity disclosure based on user preferences and contextual conditions. Users can select different anonymity levels (fully anonymous, partially anonymous, or fully identified) for different content types and communication scenarios, allowing the system to adapt between trust-building and comfort-preserving modes as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different identity disclosure policies to different content types and recipients. Users can specify which content types (e.g., text messages, annotations, video) should be shared anonymously versus identified, and can control visibility to different recipient groups (e.g., all participants vs. moderators only), creating localized quality variations in identity disclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If users communicate anonymously using separate applications or devices, then identity control is improved, but computing resource utilization increases due to redundant systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity controlVSAvoidcomputing resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges anonymous communication capabilities directly into the existing communication session infrastructure. Users can switch between anonymous and identified modes within the same application and session, eliminating the need for separate applications or devices and reducing computing resource utilization while maintaining identity control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The communication system is designed to handle multiple communication modes (anonymous text, identified video, anonymous annotations, etc.) within a single unified platform. This multi-functionality allows users to control identity disclosure across different content types without requiring separate specialized applications, optimizing resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If users communicate anonymously using separate devices, then identity privacy is improved, but communication efficiency is reduced due to redundant resource usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity privacyVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines anonymous communication features within the same communication session platform, allowing users to maintain identity privacy while communicating efficiently with all participants in a single session rather than using separate devices or applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides dynamic identity management where users can switch between anonymous and identified modes based on the communication context, allowing efficient participation in shared experiences while maintaining privacy control without the inefficiencies of separate communication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the system displays all user identities in a communication session, then accountability is improved, but inclusivity and participation are reduced due to discomfort in revealing identity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccountabilityVSAvoidinclusivity and participation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts identity visibility based on user preferences and content type. Users can select which content types should be shared anonymously versus with full identification, allowing the system to adapt between accountability and inclusivity modes to maximize participation while maintaining necessary accountability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different identity disclosure policies to different content types and recipient groups. Users can control whether their identity is displayed for text messages, annotations, video content, or other types, and can specify different visibility levels for different recipient groups, creating local quality variations that balance accountability with inclusivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11847250B2Controlling disclosure of identities in communication sessions
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11847250B2 patent drawing
  • US11847250B2 patent drawing
  • US11847250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are disclosed for a computing system that allows users to control the disclosure of their identities during communication sessions. Users can control the disclosure of their identities with respect to certain types of shared content. In one mode of operation, a user can share content anonymously. In another mode of operation, identity may be revealed when certain conditions are met or revealed to only certain other users. For example, the identity of a user who shared a comment anonymously may be revealed if multiple other users agree with that comment. In another mode of operation, the user's identity is revealed to all other users such as in a live video stream. The computing system can control display of users' identities based on user instructions or based on triggering conditions. A user interface (UI) can show content items that identify a user together with content items that are shared anonymously.