Dynamic Infeed Control for Material Reduction Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Material reduction machines like chippers and grinders face inefficiencies in processing varying materials due to overloading, which can lead to stalling or inefficient operation, especially when dealing with demanding materials that require continuous infeed systems, necessitating a solution for dynamic control of cutting cycles to maintain optimal operating speeds and prevent component damage.

Innovation Solution

A control system that uses sensors to monitor machine load parameters and adjust stop thresholds for sequential cutting cycles based on observed maximum loads and correction factors, allowing for dynamic infeed control that adapts to different materials, enabling consistent chip production and maintaining prime mover operation within an ideal speed range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If continuous infeed is used to maintain high productivity, then material processing speed increases, but machine overload and stalling occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing speedVSAvoidmachine overload prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The infeed system operates in cyclic intervals rather than continuously, feeding material to the cutting mechanism only when the prime mover can handle the load. The controller monitors machine load parameters and activates the infeed portion periodically, allowing the cutting mechanism to complete each cutting cycle before initiating the next feed action. This periodic operation prevents overload while maintaining productive material reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The infeed control system dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time machine load conditions. The controller continuously monitors load parameters and adapts the infeed timing and duration to match the prime mover's instantaneous capacity. This dynamic control enables the system to optimize productivity under varying load conditions while preventing stalling and overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If infeed stops frequently to prevent overload, then machine reliability improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverload preventionVSAvoidmaterial processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback from machine load sensors to intelligently determine infeed timing. The controller receives real-time load parameter signals and uses this feedback to decide when to activate the infeed portion, optimizing the balance between preventing overload and maintaining productivity. The system learns from each cutting cycle's load characteristics to refine future infeed decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller prepares for the next infeed action by monitoring load trends and predicting optimal timing. Before each cutting cycle completes, the system assesses whether conditions are favorable for the next feed operation, allowing seamless transitions between cutting and feeding phases. This preliminary assessment minimizes idle time while ensuring the prime mover is ready for the next load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If fixed stop thresholds are used for cutting cycles, then control simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to varying materials is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidmaterial type adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically changes the stop threshold parameter based on observed machine load characteristics for each material type. Rather than using a fixed threshold, the controller adjusts the load parameter threshold adaptively, allowing the same control system to handle diverse materials from soft wood to hard rock. This parameter adaptation maintains control simplicity while achieving high material versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically adapts to different materials through self-learning from observed load patterns. When processing a new material type, the controller monitors the prime mover's load characteristics and autonomously determines optimal stop thresholds without requiring manual reconfiguration. This self-adjusting capability enables the system to serve multiple material types while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient processing of difficult materials by optimizing cutting cycles, preventing overloading, and maintaining consistent chip size, thus extending equipment lifespan and improving operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor is operable to sense a machine load parameter via detection of at least one of the cutting mechanism and the prime mover

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed detection:

Implementation Method 2

A sensor is operable to sense a load on the material reduction machine via detection of droop in the operation speed of at least one of the cutting mechanism and the internal combustion engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed droop detection:

Data Source

PatentUS11883827B2Material reduction machine with dynamic infeed control
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 VERMEER MFG CO
  • US11883827B2 patent drawing
  • US11883827B2 patent drawing
  • US11883827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A material reduction machine includes a prime mover driving a cutting mechanism. An infeed portion engages a piece of material to feed it forward to the cutting mechanism. A sensor senses a machine load parameter via the cutting mechanism and/or prime mover and reports a signal to a controller operatively coupled to the infeed portion to control sequential cutting cycles on the piece of material. The controller utilizes a stored first stop threshold value for stopping a first cutting cycle and continues monitoring the signal as machine load increases momentarily after reaching the first stop threshold. The controller determines and adopts a second stop threshold value based on observation of the machine load parameter indicative of maximum load during the continued monitoring following attainment of the first stop threshold, and further being based on a stored correction factor. The second stop threshold value is used for a second cutting cycle.