Dynamic Inkjet Head Drive Correction for Sheet Density Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inkjet recording apparatuses face issues with density variations in check patterns recorded on sheets with quality variations, leading to unsolved image quality deterioration due to varying density information about recording heads.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus includes a correction mode that repeatedly adjusts the drive condition for recording heads until density information converges within a predetermined threshold, with the option to change the threshold if density variations persist despite multiple corrections, indicating sheet quality variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the drive condition for recording heads is corrected based on density information from check charts, then density variations in images can be suppressed, but density variations in check patterns may vary sheet by sheet due to sheet quality variations such as recycled paper

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity uniformity of recorded imagesVSAvoidconsistency of density measurement across different sheets
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the threshold value for density convergence based on sheet type detection. When sheet quality variations are detected (e.g., recycled paper), the threshold is modified to accommodate variations while still achieving acceptable density uniformity. This dynamic adaptation allows the correction process to maintain effectiveness across different sheet types without failing due to inherent variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the threshold parameter for density convergence based on detected sheet characteristics. By modifying this critical parameter according to sheet quality, the system can achieve reliable density correction across varying sheet types. The threshold adjustment allows the correction algorithm to adapt to different printing conditions while maintaining consistent image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the threshold value for density convergence is fixed, then the correction process is simple, but density information may not converge when sheet quality variations cause persistent variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of correction process controlVSAvoidconvergence of density information to specified value
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The threshold value transitions from a fixed parameter to a dynamic one that adapts based on sheet type detection. When variations persist despite multiple correction iterations, the system detects this pattern and adjusts the threshold accordingly, enabling convergence to be achieved even with sheet quality variations while maintaining manageable process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring whether density information converges within a specified number of correction iterations. Based on this feedback, the system determines whether to adjust the threshold value or terminate the correction process. This feedback mechanism prevents infinite loops while ensuring convergence when possible, balancing simplicity with precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If repeated correction iterations are performed until density converges, then accurate density information is obtained, but the correction process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of density informationVSAvoidtime required for correction process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a limited number of correction iterations (e.g., up to 5 times) rather than continuing until absolute convergence. This partial action approach provides sufficient accuracy for practical purposes while significantly reducing the time required compared to exhaustive correction. The threshold adjustment mechanism compensates for this limited iteration count by allowing greater flexibility in convergence criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The correction process automatically determines when to stop based on whether density information converges within the specified number of iterations. The system self-evaluates the convergence status and decides whether to continue correcting or terminate, eliminating the need for manual intervention and optimizing the balance between accuracy and time consumption without external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250332828A1Inkjet recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250332828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332828A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In the inkjet recording apparatus, during execution of a correction mode, an image reading part reads a check chart for density measurement recorded on a sheet by a recording part, whereby a controller acquires density information about recording heads. The controller also repeatedly corrects a drive condition for the recording heads until the acquired density information about the recording heads comes to not more than a predetermined threshold value. When the drive condition for the recording heads has been corrected to a specified number of times, it is decided whether or not the density information about the recording heads has been converging toward a specified value each time the drive condition for the recording heads is corrected, where given that the density information about the recording heads has not been converging toward the specified value, the threshold value is changed.