Dynamic Input Output Placement for Ergonomic Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ergonomic solutions are inadequate in ubiquitous computing environments where inputs and outputs are mobile, distributed, and dynamic, as they fail to effectively monitor and adapt to the changing needs of users to prevent repetitive trauma and ensure comfortable interactions.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors and adjusts the placement of inputs and outputs in smart workspaces using sensors, cameras, and machine learning algorithms to balance ergonomics with convenience based on user characteristics, task duration, and interaction frequency, incorporating modules for user profiling, context awareness, and hazard evaluation to optimize user interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional ergonomic solutions are used to monitor and alert individuals to make posture adjustments, then ergonomic awareness is improved, but the system is inadequate for ubiquitous computing environments where inputs and outputs are mobile, distributed, and dynamic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the placement of inputs and outputs based on real-time monitoring of user posture and interaction patterns. Unlike static conventional ergonomic solutions, this system continuously adapts to changing user needs and environmental conditions, making the workspace dynamically responsive to ergonomic requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors user posture, analyzes interaction data, and repositions inputs and outputs without requiring manual user intervention. The workspace self-adjusts to ergonomic optima based on collected data, eliminating the need for users to manually configure their environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If inputs and outputs are made mobile and distributed to improve convenience, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of repetitive trauma increases due to lack of ergonomic monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction convenienceVSAvoidrepetitive trauma risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects data on user posture, interaction frequency, and duration, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust input and output placements. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that convenience is maintained while ergonomic risks are monitored and mitigated through data-driven adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively positions inputs and outputs in ergonomically optimal locations before users develop harmful patterns. By analyzing interaction data and predicting potential ergonomic issues, the system preemptively adjusts the workspace to prevent repetitive trauma before it occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system dynamically adjusts placement of inputs and outputs based on interaction incidence and length of time, then ergonomic health is improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic health protectionVSAvoidsystem computational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors key parameters such as interaction incidence, length of time, and user posture, then adjusts input and output placements based on changes in these parameters. By focusing on critical ergonomic parameters rather than all possible variables, the system achieves reliable ergonomic protection with manageable computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10705673B2Posture and interaction incidence for input and output determination in ambient computing
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 INTEL CORP
  • US10705673B2 patent drawing
  • US10705673B2 patent drawing
  • US10705673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses and methods for technology that provides smart work spaces in ubiquitous computing environments. The technology may determine a task to be performed in a smart work space and perform task modeling, wherein the task modeling includes determining one or more user interfaces involved with the task. One or more placements may be determined for the one or more user interfaces based on one or more ergonomic conditions, an incidence of an interaction, and a length of time of interaction. The technology may position the one or more user interfaces into the smart work space in accordance with the determined one or more placements.