Dynamic Inspection Level Adjustment for Printed Sheet Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inspection systems face challenges in configuring optimal inspection levels for image quality on printed sheets, leading to either excessive detection of non-defective sheets or missed defects, as users struggle to determine the appropriate inspection level configuration.

Innovation Solution

An inspection system that includes a reading unit for generating read image data, an inspection unit for comparing data at multiple candidate inspection levels, and a control unit for displaying inspection results, allowing users to adjust the inspection level based on first and second inspection results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the inspection level is configured to be too high, then the detection precision of defects is improved, but the number of sheets determined to be defective despite being within a permissible range increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidnumber of sheets determined defective
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection level is made dynamically adjustable through a user interface that allows operators to select from multiple candidate inspection levels. The system provides real-time feedback showing how different inspection levels affect defect detection results, enabling dynamic optimization between detection precision and productivity based on actual production needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the inspection parameter (inspection level) from a fixed value to a selectable range of values. By providing multiple candidate inspection levels and allowing users to switch between them, the system enables parameter optimization to balance defect detection precision with productivity, reducing false positives while maintaining acceptable detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the inspection level is configured to be too low, then the productivity is improved, but defects which should be detected will be more likely to be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection level is made dynamically adjustable through a user interface that allows operators to select from multiple candidate inspection levels. The system provides real-time feedback showing how different inspection levels affect defect detection results, enabling dynamic optimization between detection precision and productivity based on actual production needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the inspection parameter (inspection level) from a fixed value to a selectable range of values. By providing multiple candidate inspection levels and allowing users to switch between them, the system enables parameter optimization to balance defect detection precision with productivity, reducing false positives while maintaining acceptable detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If multiple inspection levels are provided with detailed comparison results, then the ease of operation for configuring inspection levels is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection level configurationVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified visual copies of inspection results at different inspection levels, allowing users to compare outcomes without dealing with complex underlying parameters. By displaying visual representations of how different inspection levels affect defect detection, the system makes configuration easier while managing complexity through intuitive visualization rather than exposing complex system internals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The user interface acts as an intermediary between the user and the complex inspection level configuration. It translates complex inspection parameters into simple visual comparisons showing defect detection results at different levels, enabling ease of operation while hiding the underlying system complexity from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240296538A1Inspection system
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 CANON KK
  • US20240296538A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296538A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296538A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inspection system includes a reading unit that reads a sheet on which a target image is formed to generate read image data, an inspection unit that inspects the target image by comparing the read image data with a reference image data at an inspection level configured from among candidate levels to generate a first inspection result, and a control unit that causes a display apparatus to display an inspection result. In a case where the first inspection result meets a predetermined condition, the control unit causes the display apparatus to display the first inspection result and to display a second inspection result. The second inspection result is obtained by inspecting the target image at one or more candidate levels that are different from the inspection level.