Dynamic Insurance Funding System Using Variable Premium Adjustments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for managing financial funding of finite insurance policies require insureds to pay the same premium regardless of loss conditions, leading to financial burdens in years with high losses and unfairness in premium payments.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that calculates and stores variable funding amounts based on defined conditions, allowing for accelerated funding in beneficial periods and reduced payments in unbeneficial periods, using index values from volatile indicators like weather data to determine premium adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed funding amounts are paid for every calculation period, then the insurer receives stable premium income, but the insured pays the same premium regardless of financial benefit, creating unfairness and burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestable premium incomeVSAvoidpremium adjustment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic premium adjustment by introducing a variable funding amount that changes based on the insured's financial situation in each calculation period. The computer system calculates whether to apply fixed or variable funding amounts based on predefined conditions, allowing the premium structure to adapt dynamically rather than remaining static. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability through the structured approach while achieving adaptability through condition-based variable adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of funding amount from fixed to variable based on the insured's financial conditions. The computer system determines whether to apply a fixed funding amount or a variable funding amount (which can be zero) in each calculation period based on predefined conditions. This parameter change allows the system to maintain stable income structure while adapting premium requirements to actual financial needs, resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If variable funding amounts are used to accelerate funding in beneficial periods, then the insured's financial burden is reduced in unbeneficial periods, but the calculation and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial burden reductionVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the computer system automatically calculates and determines the appropriate funding amount (fixed or variable) based on predefined conditions and the insured's financial situation. The system autonomously evaluates whether to apply variable funding to accelerate payments in beneficial periods without requiring manual intervention. This automation reduces the operational complexity burden on users while achieving ease of operation through automatic financial burden adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the computer system continuously monitors the insured's financial situation and loss conditions across calculation periods. Based on this feedback, the system adjusts the funding amount applied in each period, using information from previous periods to inform current decisions. This feedback loop enables automatic adaptation to financial conditions while managing complexity through systematic rather than ad-hoc adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the same premium is charged regardless of loss conditions, then the insurer's revenue is predictable, but the insured pays unfair premiums in years with high losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue predictabilityVSAvoidpremium fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the premium structure into fixed funding amounts and variable funding amounts that can be applied in different calculation periods. Rather than charging a uniform premium, the system divides the funding into discrete periods where the insured may receive fixed funding, variable funding, or no funding at all based on loss conditions. This segmentation allows revenue predictability through the structured approach while achieving fairness by adjusting premiums to match actual loss experiences in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic premium adjustment where the funding amount changes based on the insured's financial situation and loss conditions in each calculation period. The computer system determines whether to apply fixed or variable funding amounts dynamically, allowing the premium structure to adapt to changing conditions. This dynamic approach maintains revenue predictability through systematic adjustment rules while achieving premium fairness by aligning payments with actual financial needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8126802B1Computer system and method for managing financial funding of a finite insurance policy
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 SWISS REINSURANCE CO LTD
  • US8126802B1 patent drawing
  • US8126802B1 patent drawing
  • US8126802B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a computer system and in a computer-implemented method for managing financial funding of a finite insurance policy provided by an insurer to an insured, a fixed amount of the financial funding is stored as an amount payable by the insured for a calculation period. In addition, a variable amount of the financial funding is calculated based on defined conditions and the variable amount is stored as an amount payable by the insured for the calculation period. Preferably, an index value based on a volatile indicator is stored. Depending on the index value, it is determined whether the variable amount is payable by the insured or whether an insured loss is payable by the insurer to the insured for the calculation period. The variable amount or the insured loss, respectively, is calculated based on the index value. Consequently, funding of the insurance can be accelerated in good calculation periods having no losses. In bad calculation periods, on the other hand, extra funds accumulated in good calculation periods can be used by the insurer to pay insured losses.