Dynamic Interchange Fee Pricing Based on Spending History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment card systems rely on static interchange rates based on card product types, failing to account for individual spending habits, which can lead to imbalanced benefits and costs for cardholders and merchants, affecting the system's overall value and merchant acceptance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic interchange fee system that assesses fees based on payment card account spending history, allowing for variable interchange rates that reflect individual cardholder behavior, thereby balancing benefits and costs dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If static interchange rates based on card product types are used, then the fee structure is simple and easy to manage, but it fails to account for individual spending habits, leading to imbalanced benefits and costs for cardholders and merchants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of managing interchange ratesVSAvoidability to account for individual spending habits
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic interchange rates that automatically adjust based on real-time spending patterns, transaction frequency, and cardholder behavior. The system transitions from static card-product-based rates to dynamic individualized rates that adapt continuously, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and adaptability to individual spending habits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used to determine interchange rates from fixed card product types to variable parameters including spending amount, transaction frequency, and behavioral patterns. This allows the fee structure to adapt to individual cardholder characteristics while maintaining automated management through algorithmic parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If interchange rates are set too high to compensate issuers for risks and costs, then issuers' willingness to issue and promote payment cards increases, but merchant discount rates become disproportionately high, reducing merchants' desire to accept the cards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissuers' willingness to issue and promote cardsVSAvoidmerchants' desire to accept cards
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different interchange rates to different cardholders based on their individual spending patterns and risk profiles rather than applying uniform rates to all card product types. This localized differentiation allows issuers to compensate for risks on high-spending cardholders while charging lower rates to merchants accepting cards from lower-risk segments, resolving the contradiction between issuer compensation and merchant acceptance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts interchange rates in real-time based on actual spending behavior and risk assessment, allowing rates to optimize for both issuer compensation and merchant acceptance simultaneously. This dynamic adjustment resolves the static trade-off between high rates for issuer protection and low rates for merchant attractiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If interchange rates are set too low to maintain competitive merchant discount rates, then merchants' desire to accept cards increases, but issuers' willingness to issue and promote cards decreases, reducing cardholders' demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerchants' desire to accept cardsVSAvoidissuers' willingness to issue and promote cards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements location-specific and cardholder-specific interchange rate differentiation, allowing the system to maintain low rates for merchants while ensuring adequate issuer compensation through higher rates on specific high-value or high-risk transactions. This resolves the contradiction by applying different rates to different segments rather than using uniform low rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces multiple parameters including spending thresholds, transaction categories, and behavioral patterns to determine interchange rates, enabling the system to simultaneously achieve competitive merchant rates and sufficient issuer compensation through sophisticated parameter-based differentiation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic interchange rates based on spending history are implemented, then the system can balance benefits and costs dynamically and increase network value, but the complexity of determining and assessing fees increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to balance benefits and costs dynamicallyVSAvoidcomplexity of determining and assessing fees
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated systems that self-determine interchange rates based on real-time data processing of spending patterns and transaction history. The system automatically calculates, assesses, and adjusts rates without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction by using automation to handle the complexity while maintaining dynamic adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops that monitor spending behavior, transaction patterns, and fee assessment outcomes, automatically adjusting interchange rates based on this feedback. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic rate optimization while managing complexity through automated closed-loop control rather than manual rate setting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10346731B2Method and apparatus for dynamic interchange pricing
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10346731B2 patent drawing
  • US10346731B2 patent drawing
  • US10346731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for dynamically determining interchange fees. In an embodiment, an acquirer computer transmits a payment card account authorization request to a payment processing network, and receives an authorization response authorizing the transaction and comprising a spending history indication reflecting a compilation of spending history data of a group of payment card accounts that qualify for dynamic interchange rate setting. The acquirer computer then stores the spending history indication, transmits the authorization response to a merchant processing system computer, receives a clearing file from the merchant processing system computer, determines that an interchange rate depends on the spending history indication, selects an interchange rate from an interchange rate selection database based on the spending history indication, calculates an interchange fee based on the interchange rate, and transmits the clearing file and the interchange fee to the payment network for clearing of the transaction.