Multi-Modal Machine Learning for Dynamic Interface Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interactive systems face challenges in accurately determining user intent from diverse inputs, leading to limited and biased dynamic interface options due to reliance on single types of data, which hampers timely and pertinent responses.

Innovation Solution

The use of multi-modal machine learning models, including convolutional neural networks and Weight of Evidence analysis, processes metadata and time-dependent user account information to generate dynamic interface options, reducing bias and improving feature recognition and prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-type data is used to generate dynamic interface options, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of user intent determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiduser intent determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user information into multiple distinct feature inputs: user action metadata, user account information, and device information. Each segment is processed independently through separate machine learning models, allowing comprehensive analysis without overwhelming system complexity. This segmentation enables precise user intent determination by analyzing each data type through specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-dimensional data processing to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating diverse data types (metadata, account information, device information) and processing them through multiple machine learning models. This dimensional expansion enhances measurement precision by considering user intent from multiple angles simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multi-modal machine learning models are used to process diverse data types, then measurement precision of user intent determination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intent determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex multi-modal processing task into segmented components: separate machine learning models for user action metadata, user account information, and device information. This segmentation manages complexity by handling each data type independently while combining results for comprehensive user intent determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models serve multiple functions: they process different data types (metadata, account information, device information), perform various analyses (pattern recognition, prediction), and generate comprehensive user intent determinations. This multi-functionality justifies the increased complexity by delivering enhanced measurement precision across multiple operational dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive multi-modal data is collected and processed, then reliability of dynamic interface options is improved, but loss of time for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic interface option relevanceVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and pre-processing user action metadata, user account information, and device information before they are needed for interface option generation. This pre-processing includes organizing data into structured formats and preparing feature inputs, enabling rapid processing when dynamic interface options must be generated in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments data processing into parallel streams for different data types, allowing simultaneous processing of metadata, account information, and device information through separate machine learning models. This parallel segmentation reduces total processing time while maintaining comprehensive data analysis for reliable dynamic interface options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If single data source is used for generating interface options, then ease of operation is maintained, but adaptability to different user contexts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoiduser context responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user context into distinct data sources: user actions, account information, and device information. Each segment is processed by specialized machine learning models that understand context-specific patterns, enabling high adaptability to different user scenarios while maintaining operational simplicity through automated multi-source integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds dimensional diversity by incorporating multiple data sources and processing them through multiple machine learning models. This multi-dimensional approach enhances adaptability to various user contexts (different users, devices, situations) while the automated processing maintains ease of operation without requiring manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12260070B2Systems and methods for generating dynamic interface options using machine learning models
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12260070B2 patent drawing
  • US12260070B2 patent drawing
  • US12260070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described for generating dynamic interface options using machine learning models. The dynamic interface options may be generated in real time and reflect the likely goals and/or intents of a user. The machine learning model may provide these features by interpreting multi-modal feature inputs. For example, the machine learning model may include a first machine learning model, wherein the first machine learning model comprises a convolutional neural network, and a second machine learning model, wherein the second machine learning model performs a Weight of Evidence (WOE) analysis.