Dynamic Interface for IT Infrastructure Benchmarking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic transaction-based technologies and platforms face inefficiencies in resource utilization, leading to excessive server-client requests, processing delays, increased bandwidth usage, and erroneous reports due to inadequate management of information technology infrastructure for electronic benefits accounts.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a dynamic interface with performance metrics to manage information technology infrastructure, utilizing machine learning and statistical techniques to identify similar administrators, generate benchmarking reports, and optimize resource allocation, thereby improving the efficiency of electronic transaction-based technologies and platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing electronic transaction-based technologies use traditional server-client architecture for managing electronic benefits accounts, then basic account management functionality can be provided, but excessive server-client requests and processing delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveaccount management processing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing delays

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing performance benchmarks and peer administrator comparisons in the database before actual account management operations occur. This allows the system to retrieve pre-computed data during transactions, reducing real-time processing delays and the need for excessive server-client requests.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer by implementing a dynamic interface that includes performance metrics and peer comparisons as intermediate data structures. This intermediary layer filters and aggregates information between the server and client, reducing the number of direct server-client requests and improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional interface designs are used for electronic benefits account management, then basic account information can be displayed, but erroneous reports occur due to inadequate infrastructure management

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvereport accuracyVSAvoidinformation technology infrastructure complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring account performance metrics and comparing them against peer administrator benchmarks. This feedback loop allows the system to detect and correct erroneous reports automatically, improving reliability while managing infrastructure complexity through automated validation processes.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic interface is designed with multi-functionality, serving multiple purposes: displaying account information, providing performance metrics, generating benchmarks, and validating data accuracy. This universal interface reduces the need for separate specialized components, managing overall system complexity while improving report accuracy.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If existing server-client architectures are used without optimization, then basic transaction processing can occur, but increased bandwidth usage is observed

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetransaction processing capabilityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data requests into a single optimized interface call by consolidating account information, performance metrics, and peer comparisons into one comprehensive data structure. This merging approach maintains full transaction processing capability while significantly reducing bandwidth consumption compared to multiple separate requests.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes data transmission parameters by optimizing the format, timing, and volume of data exchanged between server and client. The dynamic interface adjusts data parameters based on user needs and transaction requirements, maintaining processing capability while minimizing bandwidth usage through selective data transmission.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11810131B2Systems and methods for managing information technology infrastructure to generate a dynamic interface

Publication Date: 2023.11.07 ALEGEUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

AI summary

A system includes a device configured with a tool that interfaces with administrator devices remote from the device. The system receives an identifier of an administrator of an administrator device. The system retrieves an administrator profile corresponding to the identifier. The system identifies one or more administrator profiles stored in the administrator profile data structure of one or more different administrators. The system determines a similarity metric between the administrator profile and each of the identified administrator profiles. The system identifies the administrator profiles having the similarity metric satisfying a predetermined threshold. The system instantiates a dynamic report interface to render an electronic report indicating a first value of a first performance metric of the administrator based on the administrator profile and a second value of the first performance metric based on the identified administrator profiles. The system provides the electronic report for display via the administrator device.