Dynamic Interface Switching for Image Tagging Adaptability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional imaging devices do not allow users to easily select and apply tags suitable for specific imaging situations, such as sports events, leading to inefficient organization and searching of image data.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that acquires imaging situation information and identifies appropriate interface data from stored options to generate interface image data for display alongside taken images, enabling users to easily input relevant tags during imaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tags are provided for selection, then the user can choose appropriate tags for different imaging situations, but the interface becomes complex and difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag selection adaptabilityVSAvoidinterface operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interface dynamically changes based on imaging situation information. The control unit automatically switches between different interface modes (first interface for sport imaging, second interface for non-sport imaging) according to the detected imaging situation, making the interface adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by providing situation-specific simplicity while maintaining comprehensive tag options across different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different interface configurations are provided for different imaging situations. The first interface is optimized for sport imaging with sport-specific tags, while the second interface is optimized for non-sport imaging with general-purpose tags. Each interface locale is tailored to its specific context, providing appropriate simplicity for each situation while maintaining overall versatility across all situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a fixed interface is used for tag input, then the interface is simple to operate, but it cannot adapt to different imaging situations such as sports events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface operation easeVSAvoidimaging situation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The interface transitions from a fixed static design to a dynamic adaptive design. The control unit monitors imaging situation information and automatically switches between the first interface (for sport imaging) and the second interface (for non-sport imaging). This dynamic adaptation maintains ease of operation within each situation while gaining versatility across different imaging contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging apparatus gains multi-functionality by incorporating situation-aware interface switching. The same apparatus can provide sport-specific tagging functionality and general-purpose tagging functionality by selecting different interfaces based on the imaging situation. This universal design allows one system to serve multiple imaging scenarios effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If automatic tag selection is implemented, then the tagging process is simplified, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging process simplicityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic situation recognition and interface selection without requiring user intervention. The control unit automatically detects imaging situation information, determines the appropriate interface type, and switches interfaces accordingly. This self-service capability simplifies the user's tagging process while automating the complexity management within the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from imaging situation information to automatically adjust the interface configuration. The control unit continuously monitors imaging data, compares it against predefined situation criteria, and adjusts the interface selection based on this feedback loop. This automated feedback mechanism simplifies user operation while managing system complexity through intelligent decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9509906B2Image processing apparatus, method for processing image, and computer program
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 JVC KENWOOD CORP
  • US9509906B2 patent drawing
  • US9509906B2 patent drawing
  • US9509906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes a taken image data acquiring unit configured to acquire taken image data, a storage unit configured to store therein one or more pieces of interface data for designating a tag to be attached to the taken image data, an imaging situation information acquiring unit configured to acquire information on an imaging situation of the taken image data, an interface identifying unit configured to identify at least one piece of interface data from among the pieces of interface data stored in the storage unit based on the information on the imaging situation acquired by the imaging situation information acquiring unit, and a display image generating unit configured to generate interface image data from the interface data identified by the interface identifying unit and to generate image data for display from the generated interface image data and the taken image data.