Dynamic Interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex Communication Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face interference issues from self-interference and remote interference, which degrade service quality, especially in high-traffic areas, and existing methods are inadequate in effectively addressing these interferences.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method and apparatus that selectively applies analog and digital time domain cancellation in communication systems, using channel gain estimation to determine the need for either digital or combined analog and digital cancellation, depending on the interference level and ADC dynamic range, to effectively remove interference from both data and cyclic prefix parts in OFDM symbols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If analog time domain cancellation is applied, then interference cancellation effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation effectivenessVSAvoidcancellation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between analog time domain cancellation, digital time domain cancellation, or frequency domain cancellation based on real-time channel conditions, interference levels, and system state. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to achieve effective interference cancellation only when necessary, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by switching between different cancellation domains (analog/digital) and methods (time domain/frequency domain) based on measured channel characteristics and interference levels. This parameter adaptation enables the system to optimize the balance between cancellation effectiveness and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If digital time domain cancellation is applied, then interference cancellation is achieved with lower complexity, but effectiveness may be insufficient for high interference levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancellation system complexityVSAvoidinterference cancellation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between digital time domain cancellation and analog time domain cancellation based on measured interference levels. When interference exceeds a threshold, the system activates the more effective but complex analog cancellation path, ensuring reliability is maintained when needed while keeping complexity low during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses channel estimation and interference level detection as intermediary mechanisms to determine when to switch between cancellation methods. These intermediaries enable intelligent decision-making about which cancellation approach to apply, bridging the gap between simple digital methods and complex analog methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If frequency domain cancellation is applied, then processing efficiency is improved, but it fails to remove interference from cyclic prefix parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancellation processing efficiencyVSAvoidcomplete interference removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the interference cancellation task into two parts: frequency domain cancellation handles the data portion efficiently, while time domain cancellation handles the cyclic prefix portion. This segmentation allows each method to operate in its optimal domain, achieving both processing efficiency and complete interference removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges frequency domain cancellation and time domain cancellation into a hybrid approach. The frequency domain processor handles bulk data processing efficiently, while the time domain processor addresses the cyclic prefix interference that frequency domain methods miss. This combination achieves both high productivity and complete interference removal reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If combined analog and digital cancellation is applied, then complete interference removal is achieved, but power consumption and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete interference removalVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically activates analog and digital cancellation paths based on measured interference levels and channel conditions. During low interference periods, only simple digital processing is active, consuming minimal power. During high interference periods, the system activates the full combined analog and digital cancellation system to achieve complete interference removal, accepting the higher power consumption only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10116405B2Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in communication systems
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10116405B2 patent drawing
  • US10116405B2 patent drawing
  • US10116405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that incorporates the subject disclosure may include, for example, determining an interference based on a channel gain for each signal of a group of signals received at a receiver from a group of transmitters. A determination is made of an interference value based on a group of interference signals received at a receiver from a group of transmitters, wherein the interference value is based on channel gains that are estimated for the group of transmitters, and wherein a portion of the interference is self-interference generated from transmitting and receiving at a same time. One of an analog time domain cancellation, a digital time domain cancellation or both, is performed responsive to a determination that the interference value does not satisfy a threshold range of an analog-to-digital converter of the receiver. Other embodiments are disclosed.