Dynamic Interspinous Device Resolving Point Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interspinous process devices for treating lumbar spinal stenosis often cause point loading on spinous processes, leading to excessive subsidence or fracture, especially in osteoporotic bones, and restrict patient movement due to their rigid design.

Innovation Solution

An interspinous process device featuring a pair of superior and inferior plates connected by a joint that allows relative movement, such as channels, a universally directional capsule, spring joint, or ball joint, with spikes for fixation and an optional spacer to distribute stress, enabling natural spinal motion while maintaining decompression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a hard material spacer is used in the interspinous process device, then the device can maintain separation between vertebral segments, but point loading occurs causing excessive subsidence or fracture of the spinous process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacer structural strengthVSAvoidpoint loading on spinous process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device transitions from a uniform hard spacer to a composite structure with a resilient material body providing distributed contact surfaces, while maintaining structural integrity through the resilient material's inherent properties. This local quality change eliminates point loading while preserving separation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs composite construction by integrating resilient material (such as polyethylene or rubber) with structural components, creating a hybrid spacer that combines the load-distributing properties of resilient materials with the structural support needed for vertebral separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid interspinous process device is implanted, then stability between vertebral segments is achieved, but patient freedom of movement is unduly restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebral segment stabilityVSAvoidpatient freedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device replaces rigid static structures with dynamic resilient components that can deform and adapt to physiological movements. The resilient material allows the device to flex and move with the spine during normal activities while maintaining vertebral separation and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device changes the mechanical parameters of the spacer from rigid to resilient, allowing controlled deformation under physiological loads. This parameter change enables the device to accommodate dynamic spinal movements while maintaining structural integrity and vertebral separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the spinous process is osteoporotic, then the bone is more vulnerable to fracture, but the risk of fracture increases when the spine is in extension with a hard spacer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone structural integrityVSAvoidfracture risk in extension
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient material spacer acts as a pre-positioned cushion that absorbs and distributes mechanical loads before they can concentrate on the osteoporotic spinous process. This beforehand cushioning protects vulnerable bone during extension movements when fracture risk is highest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The device applies local quality change by using resilient material specifically at the contact surfaces with the spinous process, providing targeted protection to osteoporotic bone while maintaining overall device functionality for vertebral separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device minimizes point loading on spinous processes, reduces the risk of fracture, and allows greater freedom of movement by accommodating natural spinal biomechanics, ensuring effective pain relief and stability without relying on hard spacers.

Implementation Method 1

a spring joint, allowing relative movement between the superior plates and inferior plates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a ball joint, allowing relative movement between the superior plates and inferior plates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS8114132B2Dynamic interspinous process device
Publication Date: 2012.02.14 KYPHON SARL
  • US8114132B2 patent drawing
  • US8114132B2 patent drawing
  • US8114132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Medical devices for the treatment of spinal conditions are described herein. The medical device includes a pair of superior plates with spikes adapted to be embedded in a superior spinous process and a pair of inferior plates with spikes adapted to be embedded in an adjacent inferior spinous process. The superior plates and inferior plates are connected to each other in such a way as to allow relative motion therebetween. A spacer may be disposed between the adjacent spinous processes.