Dynamic I/O Anomaly Detection in Datacenters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face performance degradation due to abnormal behavior in components such as faulty disk arrays, switch failures, or deteriorated connections, leading to increased response times or outright failures, which existing monitoring systems fail to detect reliably and promptly.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for monitoring I/O performance anomalies using dynamic thresholding and Bollinger Band techniques to detect abnormal behavior in data center components, generating warnings for proactive issue resolution, and incorporating significance and seasonality analysis to avoid false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems are used to detect component failures, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection reliability and timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic threshold adjustment based on historical performance data and workload patterns. Instead of using fixed thresholds, the system adapts thresholds dynamically to distinguish between normal performance variations and actual anomalies, significantly improving detection reliability while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor performance metrics and adjust detection parameters based on observed patterns. The feedback loop analyzes historical data to refine anomaly detection criteria, enabling the system to improve its reliability over time without requiring proportional increases in system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If fixed threshold monitoring is used, then system complexity is low, but false alarm rate increases and detection precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddetection algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical performance data to establish baseline patterns and seasonal variations before implementing anomaly detection. By pre-processing data to understand normal behavior patterns, the system achieves higher detection precision without requiring overly complex real-time analysis algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms fixed threshold parameters into dynamic, adaptive parameters that change based on historical performance data and current workload conditions. This parameter adaptation enables precise anomaly detection by adjusting sensitivity levels according to actual system behavior, reducing false alarms while maintaining algorithmic manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If proactive anomaly detection is implemented, then system availability is improved, but computational overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availabilityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring intensity based on risk assessment and historical patterns. Instead of continuously analyzing all metrics at maximum depth, the system focuses computational resources on high-risk areas and components with known issues, improving system availability while reducing overall computational overhead through selective intensive monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic analysis cycles that adjust monitoring intensity based on system state and time patterns. During normal operation, lighter monitoring is applied, while during high-risk periods or when anomalies are detected, monitoring intensity increases. This periodic variation maintains high system availability while managing computational energy consumption effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9489138B1Method and apparatus for reliable I/O performance anomaly detection in datacenter
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 ARCTERA US LLC
  • US9489138B1 patent drawing
  • US9489138B1 patent drawing
  • US9489138B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for reliable I/O performance anomaly detection. In one embodiment of the method, input/output (I/O) performance data values are stored in memory. A first performance data value is calculated as a function of a first plurality of the I/O performance data values stored in the memory. A first value based on the first performance data value is calculated. An I/O performance data value is compared to the first value. A message is generated in response to comparing the I/O performance value to the first value.