Dynamic Item Creation Interface for Precise Manufacturer Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing physical products lack an efficient way to match user inputs with suitable manufacturers, leading to inefficiencies in product creation and resource utilization, as they do not effectively integrate user feedback and preferences into the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes a digital platform to receive manufacturing parameters from users, dynamically alter the user interface, and employ machine learning models to match users with qualified manufacturers based on uniqueness, attribute matching, and user preferences, allowing for real-time adjustments and feedback integration through augmented reality interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to match users with manufacturers, then the process is simple, but the matching accuracy and productivity are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions with product parameters and manufacturer profiles are continuously collected and used to refine matching algorithms. The machine learning models learn from past matching outcomes and user preferences to improve future matching accuracy, creating a self-improving system that balances complexity with performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual or rule-based matching mechanisms with machine learning models that automatically analyze multiple parameters including product specifications, manufacturer capabilities, and user preferences. This substitution of mechanical/rule-based systems with intelligent algorithms significantly improves matching precision while managing system complexity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If all available attributes are presented to users, then completeness is high, but the user interface complexity and time to complete product creation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribute completenessVSAvoidproduct creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complete set of product attributes into hierarchical groups and categories. Instead of presenting all attributes at once, the interface divides them into logical sections (e.g., physical properties, functional requirements, material specifications) that users can navigate systematically. This segmentation maintains information completeness while reducing perceived complexity and time required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models perform preliminary actions by pre-filtering and prioritizing attributes based on the specific product type and user history before the user even begins the creation process. Frequently used or critical attributes are presented first, while less relevant ones are hidden or grouped, allowing users to complete common product creations quickly while still having access to all attributes when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the system dynamically alters the user interface based on manufacturing parameters, then the user experience is optimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidinterface management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is designed as a dynamic system that automatically adjusts its structure, available options, and parameter visibility based on the manufacturing parameters selected by the user. When users specify certain material types or product categories, the interface dynamically displays only relevant attributes and manufacturer specializations, creating an optimized experience for each specific scenario while managing complexity through automated context-aware adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to generate manufacturers, then the matching precision is improved, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturer matching precisionVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial action by using machine learning models selectively rather than for all matching operations. For common product types with well-established patterns, the system uses pre-computed matches or simplified algorithms. For unique or complex products requiring high precision, the full machine learning models are engaged. This approach achieves high matching precision when needed while conserving computational resources for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11543802B2Multi-source item creation system
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 ETSY INC
  • US11543802B2 patent drawing
  • US11543802B2 patent drawing
  • US11543802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer readable medium for a multi-source item creation system. The method includes receiving, through a user interface and from a requesting member of a digital platform, manufacturing parameters for an item to be manufactured, dynamically altering the user interface based on the manufacturing parameters to include different user interface elements that correspond to a subset of attributes, determining, based on interaction with the different user interface elements, additional manufacturing parameters, generating, using one or more machine learning models, a set of manufacturers based on the manufacturing parameters and the additional manufacturing parameters, wherein the one or more machine learning models have been trained to generate the set of manufacturers based on a level of uniqueness of the item to be manufactured and characteristics of the manufacturers, and returning, to the requesting member, a subset of the set of manufacturers.