Dynamic Itinerary Adjustment for Real-Time Traffic Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current scheduling systems fail to accurately plan user schedules due to limitations in information accessibility and inability to adapt to real-time constraints, often leading to late arrivals or missed events.

Innovation Solution

A system that assesses various event sources to identify relevant events, generates multiple schedules, evaluates potential routes, and adjusts the itinerary in response to constraints such as traffic or unexpected events, using recognition analysis models and locational data to optimize the user's day.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If scheduling systems only use basic event information without considering travel times and traffic conditions, then the system complexity is low, but the reliability of schedule management deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule management reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating travel times between event locations and pre-identifying traffic conditions before finalizing the schedule. This allows the system to account for transportation factors in advance, improving schedule reliability without requiring complex real-time adjustments during event execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system dynamically adjusts schedules based on real-time traffic conditions and actual travel times. The system can modify event timings, suggest alternative routes, and re-optimize the schedule as new information becomes available, transforming a static scheduling approach into a dynamic one that adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If scheduling systems consider multiple event sources and habitual events, then the completeness of schedule information improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule information completenessVSAvoidinformation processing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal event detection framework that can process multiple types of event sources (calendars, emails, messages, social media) and habitual patterns through a single integrated approach. This multi-functional architecture reduces the overall difficulty of handling diverse information sources by applying consistent processing rules across different data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as event parsers, pattern recognizers, and data normalization layers that mediate between raw event sources and the core scheduling engine. These intermediaries simplify the detection and measurement processes by preprocessing and standardizing information from various sources before analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the system provides real-time itinerary adjustments based on constraints, then the productivity of schedule management improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor schedule execution, compare actual progress against the planned itinerary, and automatically trigger adjustments when deviations are detected. This closed-loop control enables real-time productivity improvements by dynamically responding to constraints while maintaining a manageable system architecture through rule-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10001379B2Itinerary generation and adjustment system
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 INRIX INC
  • US10001379B2 patent drawing
  • US10001379B2 patent drawing
  • US10001379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and/or systems are provided for routing a user between events using an itinerary. An event source (e.g., electronic calendar) may be assessed to identify event information (e.g., event locations) for events (e.g., meetings). The event information may be evaluated to determine a schedule of events. Routes between events within the schedule may be identified to determine route information (e.g., predicted travel times) for the routes. The event information and the route information may be evaluated to generate an itinerary of events. In an example, a constraint may be identified (e.g., a traffic accident along a route). The constraint may be evaluated to determine an impact (e.g., a user arriving to the meeting event late) of the constraint on the itinerary. Responsive to the impact exceeding an adjustment threshold, the itinerary may be adjusted (e.g., modifying a route between one or more events to avoid the accident).