Dynamic Jackpot Probability via Accumulated Player Contributions
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current gaming systems for awarding jackpots lack player engagement and enjoyment, as jackpot outcomes are either dependent on predetermined symbol combinations or random events beyond player control, failing to provide a dynamic and interactive experience.
Innovation Solution
A method and system where a jackpot event is initiated responsive to a player-instructed trigger, with the probability of awarding a prize dependent on a jackpot evaluation parameter accumulated over multiple games, such as credits bet or special symbols detected, allowing for a dynamic and interactive jackpot experience.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If jackpot outcome is determined by predetermined symbol combination or random event, then jackpot awarding mechanism is simple to implement, but player engagement and enjoyment are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the jackpot probability dynamic by linking it to the accumulated jackpot evaluation parameter that changes with player activity. The probability is no longer fixed but varies dynamically based on player contributions (credits bet, special symbols detected), creating an engaging experience where players can influence their chances of winning.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by continuously updating the jackpot evaluation parameter based on player actions and using this accumulated value to determine jackpot probability. The display module provides visual feedback to players about their progress toward jackpot eligibility, creating a loop that enhances engagement and informs players of their current status.
2Device complexity
If jackpot probability is fixed or random, then system complexity is low, but player control and interaction are minimized
Solution Approach 1:
The jackpot probability is transformed from a static or purely random value to a dynamic parameter that adapts based on player activity. The system accumulates jackpot evaluation parameters from player contributions and uses this accumulated value to dynamically adjust the probability, giving players meaningful control over their chances.
Solution Approach 2:
Players effectively serve themselves by making decisions that directly influence jackpot probability. Through their betting choices and game play, players accumulate jackpot evaluation parameters that increase their chances of winning, allowing them to control their own fate rather than relying solely on random outcomes.
3Reliability
If jackpot is awarded purely by random factor, then fairness is maintained, but player satisfaction and enjoyment are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The system maintains fairness through its transparent accumulation mechanism while dynamically adjusting probabilities. Players can see their progress through the display module, understanding that their contributions directly affect their chances. This dynamic approach satisfies players by giving them agency while maintaining mathematical fairness through the predetermined accumulation rules.
Solution Approach 2:
The display module provides continuous feedback to players about their jackpot evaluation parameter accumulation, creating transparency and trust. Players can see their progress and understand how their actions influence their chances, maintaining fairness while significantly enhancing satisfaction through engagement and control.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of gaming comprises initiating a jackpot event responsive to receiving an event trigger; determining whether to award a prize to a player in the jackpot event, the probability of awarding the prize in the jackpot event being dependent on a value of a jackpot evaluation parameter accumulated over a plurality of games; and awarding the prize in response to making a positive determination.