Dynamic Layer Selection in Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing techniques, such as Powder Fed Directed Energy Deposition, face challenges with inconsistent material layer thickness, leading to cumulative variances in the final part design, which are typically addressed through time-consuming manual adjustments.

Innovation Solution

The use of high-resolution design models where multiple design layers correspond to a single deposited material layer, allowing for dynamic layer selection based on actual manufacturing results, rather than expected results, to improve manufacturing accuracy, speed, and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional low-resolution design models with one design layer per deposited layer are used, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but cumulative variances in layer thickness lead to poor manufacturing precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer thickness consistencyVSAvoiddesign model resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design model is segmented into multiple high-resolution design layers (e.g., 5-10 times more layers than traditionally used) where each design layer represents a thinner incremental step. This segmentation allows the system to detect and correct small thickness variations in each deposited layer, preventing cumulative errors while maintaining manageable process complexity through automated sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments and re-slicing are performed to correct layer thickness variances, then manufacturing precision can be improved, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer thickness accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

A sensor system continuously measures the actual thickness of each deposited material layer and provides real-time feedback to the control system. The control system automatically adjusts process parameters or selects appropriate design layers based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual measurements and re-slicing operations while maintaining high manufacturing precision throughout the building process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which design layer to deposit next based on real-time sensor measurements of previous layer thickness. Instead of following a fixed sequential path through the design model, the system adapts its progression through the high-resolution design layers to compensate for variations in material deposition, enabling automatic correction without stopping production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If high-resolution design models with multiple design layers per deposited layer are used, then manufacturing precision and consistency are improved, but the complexity of process control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart dimensional accuracyVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own sensor measurements and control algorithms to automatically manage the complexity of high-resolution layer selection. The control system independently processes sensor data, determines appropriate design layer selections, and adjusts deposition parameters without external intervention, allowing the system to self-regulate the complex interactions between high-resolution design models and variable material deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances manufacturing accuracy and reduces the need for manual intervention and re-slicing, thereby saving time and cost by ensuring consistent layer thickness and minimizing material waste.

Implementation Method 1

obtain, from a sensor, a calibration measurement, the calibration measurement indicating a distance from the sensor to a build surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

a directed energy source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS10569522B2Dynamic layer selection in additive manufacturing using sensor feedback
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 FORMALLOY TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10569522B2 patent drawing
  • US10569522B2 patent drawing
  • US10569522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for improving layer selection in additive manufacturing. In particular, the present disclosure relates to methods and systems for improving layer selection in additive manufacturing using sensor feedback. In some examples, the sensor may be a distance sensor, and design layers may be selected dynamically based on determined part layer heights after layer deposition.