Dynamic Lead Failure Detection in Implantable Medical Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting faulty leads in implantable medical devices (IMDs) are inadequate, particularly in early detection and differentiation from noise, leading to inappropriate shocks and under-sensing issues, and current noise reduction techniques are insufficient in differentiating true signals from noise in ECG signals.

Innovation Solution

A method using at least three sensing electrodes to determine a dynamic error signal, which computes a dynamic detection threshold that automatically adjusts to changes in the error signal, allowing for continuous passive detection of lead failures and noise, without requiring current injection circuits or active testing, and employing multiple three-vector comparisons to pinpoint lead failure sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If impedance monitoring is used to detect lead failure, then lead failure detection capability is provided, but it fails to reliably detect early lead malfunction and produces false positives from noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead failure detection reliabilityVSAvoidearly lead malfunction detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into multiple independent measurement vectors (first vector using first and second electrodes, second vector using first and third electrodes). By dividing the detection into multiple independent channels, the system can compare results across vectors to distinguish true lead failures from noise, thereby improving both reliability and precision of early detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary comparison mechanism that uses a second measurement vector as a reference to validate findings from the first measurement vector. This intermediary step acts as a filter to distinguish genuine lead failures from noise artifacts, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If low voltage impedance checks are performed continuously, then lead failure detection is improved, but battery power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead failure detectionVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic impedance monitoring at scheduled intervals rather than continuous monitoring. This periodic approach maintains adequate lead failure detection capability while significantly reducing battery power consumption compared to continuous monitoring schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing pacing and sensing operations to gather lead integrity information passively when possible, rather than requiring dedicated active testing. The device leverages its normal operational signals to detect lead failures, reducing the need for additional power-consuming test sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If fixed sensing thresholds are used, then device operation is simplified, but noise-induced false QRS signal detection occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing threshold configurationVSAvoidQRS signal detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensing thresholds that automatically adjust based on the detected signal characteristics and noise levels. Rather than using fixed thresholds, the system adapts the threshold levels in real-time to distinguish true QRS signals from noise, improving detection accuracy without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the sensing threshold parameter based on observed signal quality and noise conditions. By adjusting this critical parameter adaptively, the device maintains high QRS detection accuracy across varying physiological conditions while avoiding false positives from noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If multiple sensing electrodes and vectors are used, then lead failure detection accuracy and noise differentiation improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead failure detection precisionVSAvoidsensing electrode configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the additional sensing electrodes serve multiple functions: they are used both for cardiac pacing and sensing operations, and simultaneously for lead integrity monitoring through impedance measurements. This multi-functionality approach improves measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity, as the same hardware components perform multiple diagnostic and therapeutic roles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8892193B2Apparatus and method for detection of lead failure in an implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 BIOTRONIK SE & CO KG
  • US8892193B2 patent drawing
  • US8892193B2 patent drawing
  • US8892193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatic threshold control and detection of lead failure in an implanted medical device obtains three sensing vectors for measurement of an electrocardiogram signal. A dynamic error signal is determined from the vectors, and may be used to set a detection threshold for insufficient ECG signals, and/or to passively monitor the device for indications of lead failure without performing an impedance measurement. Passive mode operation conserves battery power and enables continuous lead integrity checks. A quality factor may also be determined from the error signal, to indicate whether or not signal measurements are valid with respect to noise levels. If the detection threshold is allowed to decay between successive features of the electrocardiogram, the decay rate may be made adaptive such that it automatically adjusts to changes in heart rate or to changes in amplitude of the electrocardiogram features.