Dynamic Ecommerce Listing Interface With Sales-Based Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ecommerce sellers face challenges in optimizing listing configurations to maximize sales prices and volumes, as existing systems lack effective recommendations based on historical transaction data.

Innovation Solution

A pricing and listing configuration recommendation engine utilizes historical usage and sales information to suggest optimal settings, such as auction end times, promotional listings, and image quality, to improve sales outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If sellers manually optimize listing configurations without automated recommendations, then they maintain full control over listing parameters, but they lack data-driven insights to maximize sales prices and volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss of sales optimization informationVSAvoidcomplexity of recommendation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a recommendation engine as an intermediary system between historical transaction data and sellers. This engine processes vast amounts of historical data and translates it into actionable listing configuration recommendations, relieving sellers of the burden of manual optimization while providing data-driven insights without requiring sellers to directly handle complex data analysis systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables sellers to automatically generate optimized listings by leveraging historical transaction data and machine learning models. The recommendation engine performs self-service by autonomously analyzing patterns in past sales, determining optimal pricing strategies, auction durations, and promotional configurations, then presenting these as ready-to-use recommendations that sellers can directly apply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If sellers use fixed pricing strategies without dynamic adjustments, then they simplify their listing management process, but they miss opportunities to maximize sales prices based on market conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of listing managementVSAvoidreliability of sales price optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pricing and listing configuration recommendations that adapt to changing market conditions. The system continuously analyzes historical transaction data, identifies trends, and adjusts recommendations in real-time based on current market dynamics, allowing sellers to optimize prices, auction durations, and promotional strategies dynamically rather than relying on static, pre-determined configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation engine incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor listing performance, sales outcomes, and market responses. By analyzing this feedback data alongside historical transactions, the system refines its recommendations over time, improving the reliability of price optimization while maintaining ease of operation through automated, data-driven adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If sellers analyze extensive historical transaction data manually, then they can identify patterns for optimization, but they consume excessive time and resources in the analysis process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of sales pattern analysisVSAvoidtime spent on data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual data analysis mechanisms with automated machine learning systems. The recommendation engine uses algorithms to process extensive historical transaction data, identifying complex patterns and relationships that would be difficult or time-consuming for sellers to detect manually. This substitution maintains high measurement precision in pattern recognition while eliminating the time and resource burden of manual analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw historical transaction data into meaningful optimization parameters through automated processing. By changing the state of data from raw, unprocessed records to structured, actionable recommendations with specific pricing parameters, auction durations, and promotional configurations, the system enables precise pattern analysis without requiring sellers to invest time in manual data processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If sellers use generic listing configurations for all products, then they simplify their listing creation process, but they fail to tailor optimizations to individual product characteristics and seller strategies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of listing creationVSAvoidadaptability to individual products
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing customized listing configuration recommendations tailored to each specific product and seller context. The recommendation engine analyzes individual product characteristics, historical performance data, and seller-specific patterns to generate localized optimization suggestions for pricing, auction durations, photos, and promotions, rather than applying uniform generic configurations across all listings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Reliability

If sellers invest more resources in creating detailed listings with multiple photos and promotions, then they improve listing quality and attractiveness, but they increase their costs and resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of sales outcomeVSAvoidresource consumption for listing creation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation engine applies partial or excessive action by selectively recommending specific listing enhancements based on their expected impact. Rather than universally recommending all possible improvements (excessive action), the system identifies and recommends only those specific elements—such as additional photos, promotional placements, or pricing adjustments—that will most significantly improve sales outcomes for each individual listing, optimizing resource investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12423744B2Dynamically updated listing user interface
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 EBAY INC
  • US12423744B2 patent drawing
  • US12423744B2 patent drawing
  • US12423744B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example embodiment, an item characteristic is received, the item characteristic pertaining to an item being listed for sale, by a seller, via an ecommerce service. Then, a plurality of past transactions of items having the item characteristic are analyzed. Based on this analysis, a first set of one or more optimal listing configuration parameters are identified in accordance with a first set of listing criteria. Then, the first set of one or more identified optimal listing configuration parameters to the seller in a user interface that permits the seller to change one or more listing configuration parameters based on the presentation.