Dynamic Machine Modeling Using CVA for Variable Operating Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for modeling nonlinear and time-varying dynamic systems face challenges due to exponential growth in dimensionality, leading to inefficient computation and inaccurate results, especially when dealing with large-scale industrial processes and variable structure machines.

Innovation Solution

The development of a method and system using canonical variate analysis (CVA) for nonlinear parameter-varying (NLPV) systems, which transforms machine data into a dynamic state space model, allowing for efficient computation and accurate modeling by reducing the computational requirements and improving numerical stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If direct extensions of linear subspace methods are used for modeling nonlinear systems, then the modeling approach can be implemented, but the dimension of the past and future expands exponentially leading to inefficient computation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling implementationVSAvoidcomputation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the nonlinear system identification problem into a linear algebra problem by changing the parameter representation. Instead of directly modeling nonlinear relationships which causes exponential dimensionality growth, the invention uses subspace methods with linear parameter variations (LPV) where the system matrices are parameterized by time-varying parameters. This parameter transformation allows the use of efficient linear algebra operations while capturing nonlinear behavior, resolving the contradiction between implementation ease and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the dimension of past and future variables is increased to improve model accuracy, then modeling precision improves, but the computational dimension expands exponentially to 10^9 or 10^12

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the high-dimensional nonlinear problem into lower-dimensional linear subproblems. By using subspace methods, the system decomposes the state space into observable and controllable subspaces, allowing accurate modeling without requiring exponential numbers of variables. The segmentation of the mathematical approach enables achieving high modeling accuracy while keeping computational dimensions manageable through structured matrix operations rather than brute-force variable expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from thinking in terms of expanding time-lag dimensions (which causes exponential growth) to utilizing matrix space dimensions. By formulating the problem in terms of state-space matrices and using singular value decomposition, the approach captures system dynamics in a compact matrix representation rather than expanding the temporal dimension, effectively changing the dimensional space in which the problem is solved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If iterative subspace approach is used for estimating nonlinear terms, then computation requirements are modest, but the heuristic algorithm does not substantially improve modeling accuracy for nonrandom scheduling functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation requirementsVSAvoidmodeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms in the form of parameter-update algorithms that use prediction errors to refine the LPV model parameters. The iterative least-squares or gradient-based optimization adjusts the time-varying parameters to minimize prediction errors, creating a feedback loop that continuously improves model accuracy. This structured feedback approach replaces heuristic methods with systematic optimization, achieving both computational efficiency and high accuracy for nonrandom scheduling functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10996643B2Method and system of dynamic model identification for monitoring and control of dynamic machines with variable structure or variable operation conditions
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 ADAPTICS
  • US10996643B2 patent drawing
  • US10996643B2 patent drawing
  • US10996643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for forming a dynamic model for the behavior of machines from sensed data. The method and system generates a dynamic model of the machine by applying a canonical variate analysis (CVA) method to subspace system identification extending to parameter varying (LPV) systems and nonlinear (NL) systems in order to make implementation of the computation feasible and accurate.