Dynamic Map Update via Vehicle Behavior Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicle technologies lack the ability to effectively update map data based on the behavior of surrounding vehicles, relying on periodic updates and environmental discrepancies without direct observation of vehicle behavior.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize external sensors such as cameras, LiDAR, and radar to monitor the behavior of surrounding vehicles, compare it to map data, and determine if updates are necessary, with a computing device analyzing patterns and confidence levels to decide on map updates and communication with remote servers for synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If map data is updated periodically or based on environmental discrepancies, then map data can be maintained with minimal computational resources, but the map data becomes outdated and less accurate in dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap data accuracyVSAvoidmap update delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring vehicle behaviors and comparing them against map data to detect discrepancies. When deviations are detected (e.g., vehicles traveling on shoulders, unusual routing patterns), this feedback triggers automated map update processes, ensuring map accuracy is maintained through continuous validation rather than periodic updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying and geo-fencing areas where vehicle behavior deviations occur. This allows the system to proactively collect and analyze sensor data from these specific regions before discrepancies become widespread issues, enabling timely map updates rather than reactive corrections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If vehicle sensor data is continuously collected and analyzed to detect behavior patterns, then map update accuracy improves, but computational resources and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle behavior detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing computational resources on specific geo-fenced regions where vehicle behavior deviations are detected. Rather than analyzing all sensor data uniformly across all areas, the system concentrates processing power on localized regions with anomalies, improving detection accuracy while reducing overall computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the monitoring process into distinct stages: initial discrepancy detection, geo-fence creation, targeted data collection within fences, pattern analysis, and map update decisions. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and reduces the complexity of any single processing stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the system monitors and analyzes vehicle behavior patterns in real-time, then navigation safety improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation safetyVSAvoidcomputing device energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by monitoring vehicle behaviors continuously but only initiating full analysis and map update processes when specific triggers occur (detected deviations from expected behavior). During normal operation, the system performs lighter-weight monitoring, reducing energy consumption while maintaining navigation safety through event-driven intensive processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11703335B2Coordinating and learning maps dynamically
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11703335B2 patent drawing
  • US11703335B2 patent drawing
  • US11703335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle behavior monitor installed in a host vehicle that monitors the behavior of other vehicles. When the behavior of the other vehicles appears to deviate from an expected trajectory of an in-vehicle map, a geo-fenced region is monitored by external sensors. The external sensor data stream is input to a pre-trained anomaly detector. The clusters from the feature space of the encoder are compared to a database of known behaviors. A confidence level is determined based on the number of vehicles which exhibit the behavior. If the confidence level is equal to or greater than a confidence level threshold, a persistence value is calculate based on the type of behavior. The behavior and the persistence value are used to update the in-vehicle map. Based on the persistence value, the update is transmitted to a map server when the host vehicle enters an area of high data connectivity or is dropped.