Dynamic Master Audio Device Selection via Throughput Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The selection of a master device for synchronized audio output in a group of audio devices can affect the quality of the audio output, and existing methods fail to adapt effectively to changing network conditions, leading to suboptimal performance due to variations in signal strength and data throughput.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for continuously determining the most suitable audio device to act as a master device by evaluating data throughput values, signal strength, and other signal quality metrics, using multi-armed bandit algorithms and communication scores to dynamically adjust the selection based on historical communication data and current network conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed master device is selected for audio distribution, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but audio output quality deteriorates when network conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaster device selection simplicityVSAvoidaudio output quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects the master device based on real-time network conditions and device performance metrics rather than using a fixed selection. The master device selection is continuously adjusted to optimize audio output quality while adapting to changing network environments, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and quality reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor network conditions and audio device performance, using this information to make informed decisions about master device selection. This feedback loop ensures that the master device selection maintains high audio output quality while adapting to changing conditions, preventing the quality deterioration that would occur with fixed selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the master device is frequently changed to adapt to network conditions, then audio output quality is improved, but system stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio output qualityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs master device selection at periodic intervals rather than continuously or on every network condition change. This periodic evaluation maintains system stability by avoiding excessive reconfigurations while still adapting to significant changes in network conditions, thus preventing the instability that would result from frequent master device changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes master device selection parameters (such as data throughput values and signal strength metrics) based on monitored network conditions rather than changing the master device itself frequently. This approach maintains audio output quality by adjusting selection criteria while preserving system stability by avoiding constant reconfiguration of the audio distribution architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If network conditions are continuously monitored to optimize master device selection, then audio output quality is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio output qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous monitoring of network conditions and device performance metrics to ensure optimal audio output quality. This continuous action allows the system to adapt to changing conditions in real-time, maintaining high quality audio distribution while the energy consumption is managed through efficient monitoring and selective master device reselection rather than constant full-system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10200724B1System for optimizing distribution of audio data
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10200724B1 patent drawing
  • US10200724B1 patent drawing
  • US10200724B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for selecting an audio device from a group of devices to function as a master device that receives data from a remote source and distributes the data to other devices within the group. Each device is used for this purpose at least once to determine at least one data throughput value attainable by the device. Based the data throughput values for the devices, signal strength data for the devices, and characteristics of the devices themselves, a master device and a length of time that the audio device is to be used as the master device is determined. Other lengths of time that other devices are to be used temporarily as master devices may also be determined. As additional data throughput values are determined from each instance that a device is used, the determined master device and the lengths of time that each device is used may change.