Dynamic Matrix Control for Steam Temperature Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current steam temperature control methods in boiler systems, particularly in steam generating systems, are inadequate for managing short-term fluctuations and are reactionary, leading to stress on the system and reduced component lifespan due to large temperature swings.

Innovation Solution

A dynamically-tuned control system using a dynamic matrix controller (DMC) that adjusts the rate of change of disturbance variables to generate control signals, allowing for predictive and proactive control of steam temperature, reducing the reliance on reactionary PID-based control methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional PID-based reactionary control methods are used to control steam temperature, then the control system is simple to implement, but the system experiences large temperature swings and stress on components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system implementationVSAvoidcomponent lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by detecting the rate of change of disturbance variables (such as fuel flow, feedwater flow, steam flow) and proactively adjusting control signals before temperature deviations occur. This predictive approach prevents large temperature swings rather than reacting to them after they happen, thereby extending component lifespan while maintaining control effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts control parameters based on the rate of change of disturbance variables. By continuously monitoring how quickly disturbances are changing and adapting control signals in real-time, the system optimizes the balance between responsiveness and stability, reducing thermal stress on components while maintaining tight temperature control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If traditional control methods are used, then the control system structure is simple, but the control precision around setpoints is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidtemperature control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By detecting the rate of change of disturbance variables in advance, the control system anticipates temperature deviations and adjusts control signals proactively. This preliminary action enables tighter control around setpoints by preventing deviations before they occur, achieving higher temperature control precision without requiring complex multi-variable control architectures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements enhanced feedback by continuously monitoring the rate of change of disturbance variables (fuel flow, feedwater flow, steam flow) and using this information to adjust control signals. This rate-of-change feedback mechanism provides additional control information that improves temperature control precision while maintaining a relatively simple control system structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If reactionary control is used to manage steam temperature, then the control logic is straightforward, but large temperature swings cause stress on system components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logicVSAvoidthermal stress on components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by detecting the rate of change of disturbance variables and proactively adjusting control signals before temperature deviations occur. This prevents large temperature swings that cause thermal stress on boiler tubes, steam turbine blades, and other components, thereby reducing harmful thermal stress effects while maintaining straightforward control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting impending temperature deviations through rate-of-change detection of disturbance variables and applying counteracting control signals in advance. This preemptive counter-action prevents large temperature swings before they occur, protecting components from thermal stress while keeping the control logic relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS9447963B2Dynamic tuning of dynamic matrix control of steam temperature
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT POWER & WATER SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9447963B2 patent drawing
  • US9447963B2 patent drawing
  • US9447963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique of controlling a steam generating boiler system includes dynamically tuning a rate of change of a disturbance variable (DV) to control operation of a portion of the boiler system, and in particular, to control a temperature of output steam to a turbine. The rate of change of the DV is dynamically tuned based on a magnitude of an error or difference between an actual and a desired level of an output parameter, e.g., output steam temperature. In an embodiment, as the magnitude of the error increases, the rate of change of the DV is increased according to a function f(x). A dynamic matrix control block uses the dynamically-tuned rate of change of the DV, a current output parameter level, and an output parameter setpoint as inputs to generate a control signal to control a field device that, at least in part, affects the output parameter level.