Dynamic Media Zones DRM Policy Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital rights management systems lack flexibility and visibility in enforcing viewing requirements for advertisements or warnings, often hardcoding these requirements and failing to record their actual compliance or frequency of viewing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that supports rich, policy-based controls for managing electronic content zones, allowing dynamic modification of viewing requirements based on events or conditions, and enabling the dynamic insertion of content like advertisements, with a DRM engine that enforces these policies and records usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If viewing requirements are hardcoded into the system architecture, then the system structure is simple, but the system lacks flexibility and visibility into compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in viewing requirementsVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic viewing requirements where policies can be modified based on events or conditions rather than being static hardcoded values. The system allows runtime adjustment of viewing requirements and tracking of compliance status, transforming the rigid architecture into a flexible dynamic system that adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that track and record whether viewing requirements are honored and how many times warnings or advertisements are viewed. This feedback loop provides visibility into compliance status and enables the system to adjust behavior based on actual usage data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If hardcoded requirements are used, then implementation is simple, but there is no visibility into compliance or viewing frequency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility into compliance dataVSAvoidtracking and recording system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that track and record whether viewing requirements are honored and how many times warnings or advertisements are viewed. This provides visibility into compliance status and usage frequency without requiring overly complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables content creators and distributors to self-monitor compliance through built-in tracking capabilities. The DRM engine automatically records viewing data and makes it available for analysis, allowing stakeholders to gain insights into compliance without external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic modification of requirements is enabled, then adaptability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic modification of requirementsVSAvoidpolicy enforcement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic modification of viewing requirements based on events or conditions. Policies can be adjusted at runtime rather than requiring system recoding, enabling adaptability while managing complexity through structured policy management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the system into distinct functional components: content delivery, DRM engine for policy enforcement, and tracking mechanisms. This segmentation allows the dynamic modification capability to be isolated and managed independently, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic insertion of content is supported, then content flexibility improves, but control and enforcement difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic content insertionVSAvoidenforcement of playback policies
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic insertion of content such as advertisements into rights-managed content with governed playback. The DRM engine maintains control over dynamically inserted content, ensuring playback policies are enforced even when content is inserted at runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The DRM engine serves multiple functions: it manages rights for original content, enforces policies on dynamically inserted content, tracks compliance, and provides visibility into usage. This multi-functionality consolidates control mechanisms that would otherwise be dispersed, making enforcement more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8793808B2Dynamic media zones systems and methods
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 INNOVATION TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERS LP
  • US8793808B2 patent drawing
  • US8793808B2 patent drawing
  • US8793808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for applying digital rights management techniques to manage zones in electronic content. In one embodiment, zones are defined in a piece of electronic content, and a license is associated with the electronic content that indicates how the zones are to be accessed or otherwise used. A digital rights management engine governs access to or other use of the zoned content in accordance with the license.