Dynamic Message Output Mode Selection Based on Importance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems lack efficient methods to dynamically adjust message output based on message importance and user state, leading to suboptimal communication experiences, especially in environments requiring timely and context-aware notifications.

Innovation Solution

A communication support system that includes a first acquisition unit for acquiring messages, a creation unit for determining message type information, and an output unit for outputting messages in modes based on importance, using a network of connected devices to manage and control message delivery, adjusting output modes according to user state and message characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If messages are output in a single fixed mode, then the system is simple to implement, but communication efficiency and user experience deteriorate due to inability to adapt to message importance and user state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidmessage output control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic message output by transitioning from fixed output modes to multiple adaptable output modes (first output mode for entire messages, second output mode for type information, third output mode for reception information). The output mode is dynamically selected based on real-time evaluation of message importance and user state, allowing the system to adapt its behavior rather than following a rigid predetermined pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the output parameter (output mode) based on evaluated conditions. When message importance is high and user state indicates availability, the system selects different output modes compared to when importance is low or user state indicates unavailability. This parameter change approach allows the same hardware to produce different output behaviors based on contextual conditions, improving communication efficiency without requiring multiple physical devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the system always outputs complete messages, then information completeness is maintained, but time efficiency deteriorates when users are in states where full message processing is not needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage reproduction timeVSAvoidmessage content completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the message into different components: complete message content, type information, and reception information. Based on the evaluated importance and user state, the system selectively outputs only the necessary segments rather than always transmitting the complete message. This segmentation allows the system to reduce time loss by omitting unnecessary message portions while maintaining information completeness for the selected output mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by outputting only the necessary portion of the message based on evaluation results. When message importance is low or user state indicates limited capacity, the system outputs partial information (type information or reception information only) rather than the complete message. This partial action approach reduces time consumption while providing sufficient information for the given context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system evaluates both message importance and user state to select output modes, then communication quality improves, but processing complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidevaluation and control processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an evaluation unit as an intermediary component that mediates between the message input and the output selection. This evaluation unit assesses message importance and user state, then provides guidance for selecting the appropriate output mode. By isolating the evaluation function in a dedicated intermediary unit, the system improves communication quality through comprehensive assessment while managing processing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the system uses multiple output modes adapted to message importance, then user experience improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring appropriate output conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoiduser state and message importance detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the evaluation unit continuously monitors user state and message characteristics, adjusting output modes based on real-time feedback. The system receives feedback about user availability and message importance, then adapts its output accordingly. This feedback approach improves user experience by ensuring appropriate output modes are selected while managing detection difficulty through structured feedback loops that guide the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10601757B2Multi-output mode communication support device, communication support method, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 KK TOSHIBA
  • US10601757B2 patent drawing
  • US10601757B2 patent drawing
  • US10601757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, a communication support device includes a first acquisition unit, a creation unit, and an output unit. The first acquisition unit acquires a message to be notified to a user. The creation unit creates type information indicating a type of content of the message. The output unit outputs the message in an output mode based on importance of the message among a plurality of output modes including at least a first output mode for outputting an entire message, a second output mode for outputting the type information, and a third output mode for outputting reception information indicating reception of the message.