Dynamic Methanation Reactor Control for Gas Composition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methanation processes lack flexibility in responding to changes in reactant gas flow and composition, which can lead to fluctuations in product gas quality and inefficiencies, particularly when dealing with intermittent renewable energy sources.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting parameters such as pressure and water content between methanation stages, using a modular reactor system with control loops to maintain desired product gas quality, allowing for flexible operation and energy optimization, even during changes in reactant gas flow and composition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous operation with fixed parameters is used, then stable product gas quality is achieved, but flexibility to respond to changes in reactant gas flow and composition is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct gas qualityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment by introducing control loops that continuously monitor reactant gas flow and composition, and automatically adjust operating parameters (temperature, pressure, catalyst bed configuration) to maintain optimal methanation performance under varying conditions, thereby achieving both stability and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by modifying temperature, pressure, and catalyst bed configuration based on real-time monitoring of reactant gas conditions. The control system adjusts these parameters dynamically to maintain product gas quality while adapting to changes in renewable energy input and gas composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If pressure is increased to improve methane content, then product gas quality improves, but energy consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethane contentVSAvoidparameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback control by monitoring the methane content in the product gas and using this information to automatically adjust pressure and other operating parameters. This closed-loop control system maintains high methane content while minimizing the complexity of manual parameter management through automated decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple methanation stages are used to increase methane content, then product gas quality improves, but device complexity and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethane contentVSAvoidreactor system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the methanation process into multiple staged reactor beds with intermediate cooling zones. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high methane content through progressive conversion while managing heat release in controlled stages, reducing the need for overly complex single-stage designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting by placing catalyst beds within adiabatic reactors that contain integrated cooling channels and heat exchange structures. The nested configuration allows multiple functional elements (catalyst support, cooling pathways, temperature sensors) to be integrated within the reactor structure, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining multi-stage functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables flexible and efficient production of methane-rich product gas, maintaining high product quality and optimizing energy use, especially during fluctuations in renewable energy production, by dynamically adjusting process conditions.

Implementation Method 1

which are equipped with nickel-containing catalysts. A reactant gas that contains hydrogen and carbon dioxide in a stoichiometric ratio that is essentially suitable for methane production

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

1) CO + H 2 O ↔ CO 2 + H 2 , the so-called water-gas shift reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

2) CO + 3 H 2 ↔ CH 4 + H 2 O, the CO methanation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

3) CO 2 + 4 H 2 ↔ CH 4 + 2H 2 O, the CO 2 methanation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP2516358B1Method for producing a methane-rich product gas and reactor system usable for that purpose
Publication Date: 2020.09.23 HITACHI ZOSEN INOVA ETOGAS GMBH
  • EP2516358B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2516358B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing a methane-rich product gas, in which a starting gas containing hydrogen and carbon dioxide is catalytically methanated under the influence of at least one adjustable parameter in at least two stages and at least one criterion relating to the composition of the product gas is monitored. The criterion is fulfilled under a condition influencing the method and when the condition changes, a change in the parameter setting that preserves fulfilment of the criterion is affected.