Dynamic Software Module Loading for Wireless End Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless sensor networks rely on static end nodes with limited flexibility, where variability in behavior is managed by higher-functionality access points, lacking dynamic management capabilities, which complicates behavior changes and restricts adaptability to varying conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing systems and methods for dynamically managing functional configurations of end nodes in wireless networks by allowing them to transition between different software modules in response to trigger events, such as emergency conditions or communication failures, enabling adaptive behavior changes without requiring rebooting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If end nodes use static software modules with fixed functional configurations, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to varying conditions deteriorates and behavior flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic software module loading that allows end nodes to transition between different functional configurations based on runtime conditions. The system dynamically loads, replaces, and executes different software modules without requiring node rebooting, enabling behavior changes in response to trigger events such as emergency conditions or communication failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the end node functionality into separate software modules, each representing a distinct functional configuration. This modular architecture allows individual modules to be loaded, replaced, or updated independently, enabling flexible behavior changes while maintaining manageable system complexity through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If end nodes dynamically load and replace software modules in response to trigger events, then adaptability and behavior flexibility are improved, but device complexity and management overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior flexibilityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where end nodes automatically detect trigger events, autonomously load appropriate software modules, and transition between functional configurations without requiring manual intervention or complex external management. The nodes self-manage their behavioral changes in response to conditions such as emergency detection or communication link failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by pre-defining multiple software modules with different functional configurations that are prepared in advance. When trigger events occur, the system can quickly switch to pre-prepared modules rather than creating new configurations on-demand, reducing management complexity while maintaining behavioral flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple software modules are stored and managed in end nodes, then functional versatility is improved, but memory requirements and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by loading only the specific software module needed for the current functional configuration rather than having all modules actively resident in memory simultaneously. The system loads modules on-demand based on trigger events and operational needs, reducing memory requirements while maintaining access to multiple functional configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9204320B1End node personal definition and management
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US9204320B1 patent drawing
  • US9204320B1 patent drawing
  • US9204320B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems (100) and methods (200) for dynamically managing Functional Configurations (“FCs”) of network nodes (104, 134-138). The methods involve performing operations by a First End Node (“FEN”) in accordance with a first FC. FEN (104) has a first Software Module (“SM”) stored thereon specifying the first FC. The first SM (122) comprises a total set of codes/functions which determine how a network node is to behave. The first EN detects a trigger event for triggering a transition from the first FC to a second FC. In response to the trigger event, the FEN automatically and dynamically obtains, from a remote network node (134, 136, 138 or 144), a second SM (150 or 126) that is different than the first SM. The first SM (stored on FEN) is then replaced with the second SM. The FEN executes the second SM such that it operates in accordance with the second FC.