Dynamic Mortgage Risk Scoring for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fraud detection systems in financial transactions, particularly mortgage applications, fail to keep pace with dynamic fraudulent activities and do not effectively predict payment defaults, such as early payment default (EPD), leading to increased risk and reduced loan value in the secondary market.

Innovation Solution

A system that receives mortgage data, determines scores based on historical transaction models and credit information, and generates risk indicators for payment default and fraud, prioritizing applications and updating models to improve detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing fraud detection systems are used, then fraud detection capability is provided, but the system fails to keep pace with dynamic fraudulent activities and does not effectively predict payment defaults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect dynamic fraud and predict defaults
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic scoring models that continuously learn from new data patterns to adapt to evolving fraudulent activities. The model updates its detection criteria based on emerging fraud trends, enabling it to keep pace with dynamic fraudulent behaviors while maintaining high accuracy in both fraud detection and payment default prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where actual payment default outcomes and fraud detection results are fed back into the scoring model. This feedback loop enables the model to refine its predictions and detection algorithms, improving its ability to predict payment defaults and detect sophisticated fraud patterns over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive risk assessment models are implemented, then payment default and fraud detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system is divided into separate scoring modules, each evaluating specific risk factors such as payment default risk, fraud risk, and creditworthiness. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by processing different risk dimensions independently through specialized models, then combining results for comprehensive assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The scoring model is designed as a multi-functional system that simultaneously performs fraud detection, payment default prediction, and credit risk assessment using a unified framework. This universal approach reduces overall system complexity by consolidating multiple specialized systems into one integrated model that handles diverse risk evaluation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If historical data from multiple sources is analyzed, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and feature extraction during the application submission phase, preparing and pre-processing historical data before the final risk assessment. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during the actual prediction phase, enabling accurate multi-source data analysis without excessive processing time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts data processing parameters and model complexity based on the volume and complexity of available historical data. When sufficient historical data is available, the model utilizes comprehensive multi-source analysis for high accuracy predictions. When data is limited or processing time is constrained, the system adapts by using simplified processing parameters to maintain acceptable prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8065234B2Methods and systems of predicting mortgage payment risk
Publication Date: 2011.11.22 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US8065234B2 patent drawing
  • US8065234B2 patent drawing
  • US8065234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods and systems for detecting a risk of payment default. In various embodiments, the systems/methods receive mortgage data associated with a mortgage application of an applicant, generate one or more models based on data related to historical mortgage transactions and determine a payment default risk score based at least partly on the one or more generated models, the mortgage data associated with the mortgage application, and the credit data related to the applicant. In another embodiment, a system is disclosed for selecting mortgage applications for further fraud evaluation based on the determined risks of early payment default associated with the mortgage applications and performing the fraud evaluation on those selected mortgage applications.