Dynamic MRI Segmentation via Iterative Contour Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MRI image segmentation methods lack the ability to dynamically adapt and improve the quality of segmentation, leading to suboptimal identification of structures and boundaries in MRI data.

Innovation Solution

An iterative contour deformation method is employed, starting with a single point that expands into a shape matching the structure, with dynamically applied constraints at each point along the contour, allowing for real-time adjustment based on newly measured data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional static segmentation methods are used, then the processing method is simple, but the segmentation accuracy and quality are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static segmentation constraints into dynamic constraints that are continuously updated during the contour evolution process. The constraint at each contour point is recalculated based on the latest image data and contour position, enabling the segmentation to adapt to complex structures and improve accuracy while maintaining manageable computational complexity through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the contour evolution continuously receives information from the image data through dynamically updated constraints. Each iteration uses the newly acquired information to adjust the contour position, creating a closed-loop system that progressively improves segmentation accuracy by incorporating feedback from the image features and boundary conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If dynamic constraint updates are implemented, then the segmentation quality improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation qualityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of constraint components and image gradients before the main contour evolution loop. By pre-computing these values where possible and organizing the computational workflow, the patent reduces the computational burden during iterative updates, allowing dynamic constraint adaptation without proportionally increasing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies constraints selectively at different contour points based on local image features and boundary characteristics. Rather than uniformly processing all contour points with equal computational intensity, the method adapts the level of constraint application to the specific needs of each region, improving segmentation quality in critical areas while reducing unnecessary computations in simpler regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If iterative deformation with dynamic constraints is used, then the structure identification accuracy improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic constraint updates at strategically chosen intervals during the contour evolution process. Rather than recalculating all constraints at every single iteration step, the method updates constraints at periodic intervals while maintaining continuous contour deformation, thereby achieving accurate structure identification while reducing the frequency of computationally intensive updates and minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9898825B2Segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging data
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 LAB BODYCAD
  • US9898825B2 patent drawing
  • US9898825B2 patent drawing
  • US9898825B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is described herein an image segmentation technique using an iterative process. A contour, which begins with a single point that expands into a hollow shape, is iteratively deformed into a defined structure. As the contour is deformed, various constraints are applied to points along the contour to dictate its rate of change and direction of change are modified dynamically. The constraints may be modified after one or more iterations, at each point along the contour, in accordance with newly measured or determined data.