Dynamic MSD Determination for Wireless Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems allocate resources based on static Maximum Sensitivity Degradation (MSD) values, which can lead to suboptimal spectrum and network resource allocations due to varying receiver sensitivity among user equipment (UE) models, resulting in inefficient use of resources and potential loss of cell coverage.

Innovation Solution

User equipment (UE) is configured to autonomously determine its MSD value in real-time, considering UE-specific parameters and dynamic 3GPP parameters, and provide this value to the network, allowing for more efficient allocation of spectrum and network resources based on actual sensitivity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static MSD values are used for resource allocation, then system complexity is reduced, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation complexityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic MSD determination where the MSD value is no longer static but changes based on real-time receiver sensitivity measurements. The system continuously monitors actual sensitivity levels and updates the MSD parameter accordingly, allowing resource allocation to adapt to varying channel conditions, UE-specific characteristics, and interference environments. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making the allocation system responsive without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the network receives actual sensitivity measurements from UEs and uses this information to adjust resource allocation decisions. The UE reports measured sensitivity values to the network, which then determines appropriate MSD values for scheduling and resource allocation. This closed-loop feedback system enables efficient resource allocation based on actual conditions while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized feedback procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If UE-specific MSD values are determined autonomously, then resource allocation precision is improved, but UE complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity measurement precisionVSAvoidUE determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables UEs to autonomously determine their own MSD values by performing self-measurements of receiver sensitivity. Each UE independently measures its actual sensitivity under current operating conditions and reports this value to the network without requiring complex external calibration or configuration. This self-service approach improves measurement precision while keeping UE complexity manageable by leveraging existing measurement capabilities within the UE architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the MSD parameter from a fixed, pre-configured value to a dynamically determined value based on actual receiver sensitivity measurements. The UE measures sensitivity parameters such as noise floor, interference levels, and signal strength, then uses these measurements to determine an appropriate MSD value that reflects current operating conditions. This parameter change approach enables precise, UE-specific resource allocation while using straightforward measurement and calculation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time MSD determination is implemented, then system adaptability is improved, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic MSD determination where UEs measure and report sensitivity values at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. The network can configure the reporting periodicity based on channel conditions and service requirements. This periodic approach provides timely updates for resource allocation decisions while avoiding excessive processing overhead from continuous measurements and reporting, thus balancing adaptability with processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240421966A1Dynamic determination of maximum sensitivity degradation in a wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US20240421966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421966A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for better utilizing available resources within a wireless telecommunication system. One aspect of the present invention is user equipment (UE) configured to autonomously determine its Maximum Sensitivity Degradation (MSD) value for a particular UE configuration. The MSD value is a function of (1) selected UE-specific parameters, such as those that are determined by the characteristics of the UE's RFFE components and RFFE architecture, and (2) selected standard parameters that may be dynamic or vary over time. Another aspect of the present invention is to configure a UE to provide its determined MSD value to a communications network, either as a raw value or as a computed indication of the MSD value relative to a specified reference value. The determined MSD value may then be used by a system controller to select a more efficient allocation of spectrum and network resources.