Dynamic Multi-Supplier Model for Enterprise Transaction Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing a multi-supplier environment is complex, requiring optimized processes and compliance with various standards, but existing solutions lack flexibility and scalability to adapt to diverse enterprise needs and industries.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic multi-supplier model that identifies and executes transaction aspects across enterprise departments, scaling to fit different environments, and is flexible enough to be used in part or whole, with built-in intelligence for adaptation and improvement, supporting governance and compliance with standards like ITIL v3.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a multi-supplier environment is managed using traditional methods, then compliance with standards can be achieved, but the system lacks flexibility and scalability to adapt to diverse enterprise needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and scalabilityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-supplier management system into modular components including a supplier model with multiple selectable suppliers, transaction management modules, and department-specific interfaces. This segmentation allows the system to be scaled and adapted to different enterprise needs by selecting and configuring only the necessary components, thereby improving flexibility without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic supplier model that allows enterprises to select and switch between multiple suppliers based on transaction requirements. The system dynamically adapts to different enterprise departments and transaction types, enabling the management structure to evolve and scale with changing business needs rather than being fixed, thus improving adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized dynamic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple suppliers are integrated into the enterprise system, then service coverage and options increase, but the complexity of managing transactions and compliance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidtransaction management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal supplier model that can accommodate multiple suppliers and various enterprise departments through a single standardized framework. This multi-functional approach allows the same core system to handle different transaction types, supplier relationships, and departmental requirements, thereby expanding service coverage without proportionally increasing management complexity through reuse of standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary transaction management layer that sits between multiple suppliers and enterprise departments. This intermediary model standardizes communication and transaction flows, allowing multiple suppliers to be managed through a unified interface rather than requiring separate management processes for each supplier, thus expanding service options while containing complexity through the mediating structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a rigid supplier model is used, then compliance with standards is easier to maintain, but the system cannot adapt to different enterprise environments and industries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to enterprise needsVSAvoidcompliance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic yet structured supplier model that maintains compliance through standardized frameworks while allowing adaptation to different enterprise environments. The model can dynamically configure supplier selections and transaction processes based on enterprise-specific requirements while maintaining adherence to underlying standards, thus achieving both adaptability and compliance stability through structured flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables compliance maintenance through standardized core parameters while allowing customization through variable parameters that can be changed to adapt to different enterprise needs. By separating fixed compliance-requiring parameters from flexible configuration parameters, the system can adapt to various enterprise environments and industries while maintaining reliability through the stable core compliance framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7991631B2Managing a multi-supplier environment
Publication Date: 2011.08.02 ENT SERVICES DEV CORP LP
  • US7991631B2 patent drawing
  • US7991631B2 patent drawing
  • US7991631B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a system and method for managing multi-supplier environment. In some implementations, a method includes identifying a supplier model configured to identify information for executing different aspects of the transaction associated with different enterprise departments and a primary supplier from a plurality of selectable third-party suppliers in response to at least a request for a enterprise transaction. The model is configured to identify methodologies for executing the different aspects of a transaction. A plurality of requests for the different enterprise departments and the primary supplier are generated based, at least in part, on the supplier model and the transaction request. Each of the different enterprise departments and the primary supplier are associated with at least one of the plurality of requests. Each of the plurality of requests are automatically transmitted to at least one of the associated enterprise departments or the primary supplier in accordance with the supplier model.