Dynamic Node Labeling for AI Workload Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container management systems, such as OpenShift, face challenges in dynamically adding nodes to clusters to meet the heterogeneous resource requirements of AI workloads, leading to inefficiencies in resource allocation and increased computational overhead.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that labels and manages cloud resources by receiving job requirements, acquiring and labeling nodes from multiple cloud providers, and reusing resources after job completion to ensure guaranteed resource availability and reduce computational complexity and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If nodes are dynamically added to the cluster to meet heterogeneous resource requirements of AI workloads, then resource availability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource availabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments cloud resources into distinct node objects with specific labels identifying their resource types (e.g., GPU, TPU, CPU). Each node is independently managed and can be dynamically added or removed from the cluster based on workload requirements, allowing heterogeneous resource composition without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container management system implements a universal node labeling mechanism that can accommodate multiple resource types (GPU, TPU, CPU, storage) through a common framework. The scheduler uses standardized label-based selection criteria to allocate diverse resource types, enabling the system to handle heterogeneous AI workloads through a single multi-functional platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If cloud resources are allocated for each job, then resource availability is improved, but loss of time increases due to provisioning delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource availabilityVSAvoidwait time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-provisions cloud nodes and adds them to the cluster before jobs are submitted. Nodes are labeled with their resource characteristics in advance, creating a ready pool of heterogeneous resources that can be immediately allocated when jobs arrive, eliminating provisioning delays during job execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains a continuous pool of pre-provisioned cloud nodes in the cluster that remain available for immediate job allocation. Rather than provisioning resources on-demand when jobs are submitted, the useful action of resource availability continues uninterrupted, allowing jobs to start immediately upon submission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If cloud bursting techniques are used to scale infrastructure, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple cloud providers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal cloud management framework that abstracts multiple cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure) behind a common interface. All cloud nodes are standardized with consistent labeling conventions and can be managed through the same scheduler mechanism, enabling multi-cloud bursting capabilities while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The container management system acts as an intermediary layer between the scheduler and multiple cloud providers. It standardizes cloud node representations and manages the complexity of multi-cloud resource orchestration, allowing the scheduler to focus on productivity-enhancing allocation decisions without being burdened by provider-specific complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If aggregated resources are provisioned before job execution, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases during resource aggregation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource guaranteeVSAvoidaggregation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary aggregation of heterogeneous cloud nodes into the cluster before jobs are submitted. Nodes are pre-labeled with their resource types and capabilities, creating a ready pool of guaranteed resources. When jobs arrive, the scheduler can immediately allocate from this pre-aggregated pool without additional aggregation delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous availability of aggregated cloud resources in the cluster, keeping them in a ready state for immediate job allocation. The useful action of resource aggregation is performed in advance and continues to provide available resources, eliminating the need for time-consuming aggregation processes at job submission time while maintaining reliability guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240403143A1System and method to dynamically add nodes to a container management system cluster for ai workloads
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240403143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403143A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for labeling and managing cloud computing resources includes receiving one or more computing jobs in a job queue and obtaining resource requirements for a first one of the one or more computing jobs. Nodes are placed into a cluster for the resource requirements from one or more cloud providers and the nodes are labelled to correspond to the first one of the one or more computing jobs. The first one of the one or more computing jobs from the job queue and is executed after the labelled aggregated resources are ready.