Dynamic Noise Parameterization for Differential Privacy Trade-offs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing differential privacy systems do not allow data analysts to input their utility requirements, resulting in a fixed privacy-utility trade-off that does not consider the data analyst's needs.

Innovation Solution

The proposed system, Randomly Parameterizing Differentially Private mechanisms (R2DP), introduces a dynamic utility input mechanism that considers both privacy constraints from the data owner and utility constraints from the data analyst, optimizing the privacy-utility trade-off by applying a second distribution on the noise parameter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noise is added to query results to achieve differential privacy guarantees, then privacy protection is improved, but utility (accuracy) of the results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy guaranteeVSAvoidutility accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the noise parameter randomizable rather than fixed. The system allows the noise parameter to be dynamically adjusted based on utility requirements input by data analysts, transforming a static differential privacy mechanism into a dynamic one that can adapt to different utility-privacy tradeoff preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of the noise distribution by introducing randomization. Instead of using a fixed noise parameter determined solely by the data owner's privacy constraint, the system randomly selects from a distribution of noise parameters, allowing the actual noise level to vary and potentially achieve better utility while maintaining privacy guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fixed noise parameters are used in differential privacy mechanisms, then privacy constraints are satisfied, but utility requirements from data analysts cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy constraint satisfactionVSAvoidutility requirement adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the static noise parameter into a dynamic variable that can be adjusted based on utility requirements. Data analysts can input their utility preferences, and the system dynamically selects appropriate noise parameters from a distribution, enabling adaptation to different analytical needs while maintaining privacy guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds another dimension to the parameter space by moving from fixed noise parameters to randomizable noise parameters with distributions. This dimensional expansion allows the system to simultaneously satisfy privacy constraints and optimize for utility requirements, creating a more flexible search space for optimal parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If noise parameter is fixed based on data owner's privacy constraint, then privacy guarantee is maintained, but data analyst's utility input is not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy guaranteeVSAvoidutility input flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by incorporating data analyst's utility requirements into the noise parameter selection process. The system takes utility inputs from data analysts, uses this feedback to determine appropriate noise parameters from a distribution, and generates query results that balance both privacy and utility considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes the noise parameter dynamic by allowing it to be adjusted based on feedback from data analysts. Instead of a fixed parameter determined solely by the data owner, the noise parameter can now adapt to utility requirements, making the system more responsive to the needs of different users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12321478B2Utility optimized differential privacy system
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12321478B2 patent drawing
  • US12321478B2 patent drawing
  • US12321478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and apparatus are disclosed. In one or more embodiments, a differential privacy, DP, node is provided. The DP node includes processing circuitry configured to: receive a query request; receive a first input corresponding to a utility parameter; receive a second input corresponding to a privacy parameter; select a baseline DP mechanism type based at least on a query request type of the query request, the first input and the second input, where the baseline DP mechanism type includes at least a noise parameter; generate a noise distribution based on the baseline DP mechanism type using a first value of the noise parameter; and determine a DP query result based on applying the noise distribution to the query request applied on a data set.