Dynamic OCR Processing Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical character recognition (OCR) systems lack flexibility in determining whether to perform processing locally on a device or remotely, often relying on fixed criteria and not optimizing based on real-time conditions such as device capabilities and network connectivity.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic configuration system that determines whether to perform OCR processing locally or remotely based on device type, image type, available memory, and network connectivity, allowing for flexible decision-making and efficient resource allocation between mobile devices and OCR servers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If OCR processing is always performed remotely on a server, then processing power and computational resources are centralized, but network dependency increases and processing speed may be reduced due to network latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the OCR processing location based on real-time conditions such as network connectivity status, device capabilities, and image characteristics. The decision is not fixed but adapts to current system state, allowing the architecture to switch between cloud and local processing modes optimally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile device acts as an intermediary that can either process images locally or transfer them to the server. This intermediary role allows the system to flexibly route processing tasks based on conditions, eliminating the need for direct server processing for all cases and reducing network dependency when conditions permit local processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If OCR processing is performed locally on all devices, then processing speed improves and network dependency decreases, but legacy devices without sufficient computational resources cannot perform advanced OCR processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddevice compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates device parameters such as processing power, memory availability, and OCR engine capabilities to determine whether local processing is feasible. By dynamically assessing these parameters, the system adapts to both legacy and modern devices, routing appropriate tasks to the server while enabling local processing when device capabilities permit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The OCR processing capability is segmented between device and server based on capabilities. Modern devices with sufficient resources handle their own processing, while legacy devices offload to the server. This segmentation allows each device type to operate within its capability envelope, maintaining overall system versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a fixed architecture is used for OCR processing, then system complexity is reduced, but flexibility to adapt to different device capabilities and real-time conditions is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprocessing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture transitions from a fixed to a dynamic model where the processing location (device or server) is determined at runtime based on current conditions. This dynamic determination enables the system to adapt to varying device capabilities, network states, and image characteristics without requiring a completely complex reconfigurable architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that evaluate device type, available memory, network connectivity, and image properties to make informed decisions about processing location. This feedback-driven approach provides flexibility while maintaining manageable system complexity through rule-based decision logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8983190B2Dynamic service configuration during OCR capture
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8983190B2 patent drawing
  • US8983190B2 patent drawing
  • US8983190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamically configuring OCR processing may include determining a device type and determining whether to perform optical character recognition (OCR) processing of the received image locally based on one or more OCR parameters. Example OCR parameters may include the device type, the image type, the size of the received image, the available amount of the memory, the measured/benchmarked throughput of OCR processing on the device relative to an OCR server throughput and network throughput, and/or the current level of network connectivity. If it is determined that OCR processing of the received image should be performed locally, the device may compute one or more name-value pairs corresponding to the received image and transmit the name-value pairs to a remote data server for processing.