Dynamic Optical Security Element Verification via Digital Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for authenticating objects prone to counterfeiting, such as documents and products, are inadequate in ensuring the authenticity of optically variable security elements, which change with orientation and movement, as they often rely on manual comparison and lack real-time updates and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A control device equipped with a display screen, position and movement sensors, and communication means to generate and display a simulation of the nominal security element, allowing for dynamic comparison with the actual element, ensuring authenticity verification through synchronized movements and orientations, with the ability to access updates via a secure server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual comparison methods are used for authenticating security elements, then the process is simple to operate, but the reliability and accuracy of authentication is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital simulation copy of the nominal security element that reproduces its optical effects. This simulation is displayed on a screen and can be manipulated to match various orientations and movements, allowing controllers to compare the actual security element against the simulated reference without needing physical reference elements or complex manual comparison procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical reference elements and manual comparison with a digital system. The simulation is generated and displayed electronically, and controllers interact with it through a graphical interface, substituting physical manipulation with digital control and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If physical nominal security elements are distributed to controllers for comparison, then the comparison can be performed with real reference, but the system cannot be updated and new security elements cannot be added

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem update capabilityVSAvoidreference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic system where the simulation of the nominal security element can be updated and modified remotely. The simulation is not static like a physical reference element but can be regenerated and redistributed to controllers as needed, allowing the system to adapt to new security elements while maintaining digital reference accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The digital simulation serves multiple functions: it acts as a reference for comparison, can be updated to represent new security elements, and can be distributed to multiple controllers simultaneously. This universal digital reference replaces the need for multiple physical reference elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If controllers use physical reference elements for comparison, then the optical properties can be directly observed, but the process is time-consuming and not flexible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speedVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital simulation copy of the nominal security element that reproduces its optical effects. This simulation is displayed on a screen and can be manipulated to match various orientations and movements, allowing controllers to compare the actual security element against the simulated reference without needing physical reference elements or complex manual comparison procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If the security element is made difficult to remove from the document, then counterfeiting is prevented, but the element cannot be transferred for authentication purposes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against counterfeitingVSAvoidauthentication accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital simulation copy of the nominal security element that reproduces its optical effects. This simulation is displayed on a screen and can be manipulated to match various orientations and movements, allowing controllers to compare the actual security element against the simulated reference without needing physical reference elements or complex manual comparison procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP2489016B1Method and device for checking a secured document
Publication Date: 2018.03.07 SURYS
  • EP2489016B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2489016B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device (1) for checking a secured object (10) provided with at least one security element (11) for generating sequential or dynamic optical effects according to the orientation thereof and/or the movements applied thereto, comprising a display screen (2), a position and/or motion sensor (3) and a means for generating and displaying on the screen (2) a simulation (4) of the nominal security element associated with the secured object (10), the display depending on the orientation of the device (1) as determined by the position and/or motion sensor (3), so as to be able to compare the security element (11) of the object (10) to be checked and the simulation (4) according to the respective orientations or movements thereof. The present invention also relates to a method for checking the secured object (10) by means of such a device (1).