Dynamic Optimization Model for Remanufacturing Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of high-tech configurable multi-generation products complicates supply chains and remanufacturing operations due to variability in configuration combinations, impacting inventory management and decision-making processes, which rely heavily on heuristic rules and expert opinions, often overlooking available return inventory and resource adequacy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates real-time operational decisions by developing dynamic optimization models from return product data, configuring return products to a commodity level, and creating plans for remanufacturing-oriented processes to recommend configurations, thereby optimizing production and inventory management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dynamic optimization models are implemented for real-time operational decisions, then productivity and resource utilization improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremanufacturing operational efficiencyVSAvoidmodeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the remanufacturing decision-making process into distinct functional modules: return product data collection, quality analysis, dynamic optimization model development, remanufacturing plan creation, and configuration recommendation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the complex decision process, making the overall system more manageable and implementable while maintaining high productivity through coordinated operation of these segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If expert opinion and heuristic rules are used for decision-making, then ease of operation is maintained, but manufacturing precision and optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making simplicityVSAvoidoperational decision accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a computer-implemented intermediary layer that acts as a mediator between the complexity of dynamic optimization models and the simplicity required for operational decision-making. The intermediary automatically collects return product data, performs quality analysis, develops optimization models, and generates configuration recommendations, thereby maintaining ease of operation while achieving high manufacturing precision through algorithmic optimization rather than manual expert judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If return product data is thoroughly analyzed and configured to commodity level, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn product configuration accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting return product data and conducting quality analysis as soon as products are returned, before remanufacturing decisions are required. This preliminary processing prepares the data in advance, enabling rapid development of dynamic optimization models and quick generation of configuration recommendations when needed, thereby reducing the time loss associated with thorough analysis while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240104516A1Remanufacturing orientated operations
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240104516A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104516A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104516A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Making real-time operational decisions for remanufacturing operations by receiving data on return product including analysis of return product quality, and configuring the return product meeting quality threshold to commodity level. At least one dynamic optimization models is developed from data on the return product. A plan is created for a remanufacturing-oriented process from the at least one dynamic optimization models. The dynamic plan declares all activists required to build final product including all alteration and other activities such as disassembly, assembly, quantity needed from each return and replenishment quantity of new commodity. A final product is matched to an inventory of return product based on the plan for the remanufacturing-oriented process to provide a configuration recommendation.