Dynamic Order Allocation in Venue Management Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large venues face revenue loss and user dissatisfaction due to congestion and delays in order fulfillment by vendors, leading to decreased user loyalty and attendance, as existing systems fail to efficiently manage communication and delivery of orders.

Innovation Solution

A venue management system that communicates orders to vendors based on their fulfillment times, locations, and delivery personnel usage, optimizing order allocation across multiple vendors to minimize delivery time and distance, thereby enhancing user experience and revenue generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If orders are communicated to vendors without optimization, then all vendors receive orders equally, but fulfillment delays occur and user satisfaction decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoidorder delivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically assigns orders to vendors based on real-time conditions including current workload, location proximity to user, and historical fulfillment performance. This dynamic allocation adjusts continuously as venue conditions change, optimizing fulfillment speed without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously when selecting which vendor receives an order: vendor location coordinates, current order queue length, average fulfillment time metrics, and delivery distance to user. By optimizing across these multiple parameters rather than a single criterion, the system achieves faster overall fulfillment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If more vendors are used to fulfill orders, then order capacity increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal order capacityVSAvoidvendor management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vendor management system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: it tracks vendor locations, monitors real-time order queues, calculates optimal assignments, communicates orders to vendors, and monitors fulfillment status. This multi-functional approach increases order capacity without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically manages vendor assignments and order distribution without requiring manual vendor management. Vendors simply receive orders through the system and fulfill them, with the system self-adjusting assignments based on performance data. This automation handles the complexity of coordinating multiple vendors while keeping the interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If delivery personnel are deployed extensively, then delivery coverage improves, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery service coverageVSAvoiddelivery personnel usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and prepares optimal delivery assignments in advance based on predicted order volumes and vendor locations. By pre-positioning delivery personnel strategically and pre-planning delivery routes before orders arrive, the system improves delivery coverage without requiring excessive personnel on standby.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intelligent intermediary that optimizes the matching between delivery personnel and orders. It considers delivery personnel location, current tasks, and order priorities to create efficient assignments, maximizing the coverage achievable with limited personnel rather than simply adding more people.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10535090B2Modifying communication of orders to vendors within a venue
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 VENUENEXT INC
  • US10535090B2 patent drawing
  • US10535090B2 patent drawing
  • US10535090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To improve user interaction with a venue, a venue management system is associated with the venue and maintains information associated with users and with vendors associated with the venue. The venue management system receives orders for products or services from users and communicates the received orders to vendors associated with the venue to be fulfilled. The venue management system dynamically modifies communication of orders to various vendors associated with the venue for fulfillment to expedite order fulfillment. To modify communication of orders to vendors, the venue management system accounts for times for different vendors to fulfill orders, delivery times from vendors to users, resources used to fulfill orders by various vendors, and distances between various vendors and users placing orders.