Dynamic Order-Worker Matching Using Multi-Mode Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed network environments face challenges in dynamically matching heterogeneous tasks with heterogeneous client devices, exacerbated by incomplete information, real-time data updates, and client device constraints such as limited processing power and memory, as well as worker unwillingness to provide data or expend time.

Innovation Solution

A work distribution platform utilizing multiple dynamic matching systems that include a worker offering system, platform offering system, and open order system, which operate simultaneously to match orders with workers, leverage machine learning models for inference, and generate training data to improve matching accuracy, while allowing workers more control over order acceptance and pricing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single matching system is used to pair tasks with workers, then the system complexity is low, but the matching precision and adaptability to heterogeneous tasks and workers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the matching system into multiple specialized matching systems, each handling different types of tasks or workers. This segmentation allows each subsystem to optimize for specific matching criteria while the overall system maintains complexity through modular organization rather than monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The platform implements multiple matching systems that can handle different matching scenarios (e.g., skill-based matching, location-based matching, time-based matching). Each system serves a specific function but collectively they provide universal coverage for heterogeneous task-worker pairing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to infer missing information, then the matching accuracy improves, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and preprocessing worker and task data before matching occurs. Machine learning models are trained in advance on historical data, and inference is performed only when needed for actual matching decisions, reducing real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies machine learning selectively rather than universally. It uses ML inference only for cases where information is missing or ambiguous, while relying on direct data comparison for complete cases, thus avoiding excessive computational overhead while maintaining accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If multiple matching systems operate simultaneously, then the matching efficiency and adaptability improve, but the system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching efficiencyVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinator component that acts as an intermediary between multiple matching systems. This coordinator receives task requests, determines which matching systems are applicable, routes requests appropriately, and aggregates results, thereby managing complexity without sacrificing the benefits of multiple simultaneous systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If workers are given control over order acceptance and pricing, then the worker satisfaction improves, but the platform's ability to optimize matching deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker satisfactionVSAvoidmatching optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where worker preferences and pricing decisions are collected and fed back into the matching algorithms. This allows the platform to learn from worker behavior and adjust optimization strategies accordingly, balancing worker autonomy with system-wide optimization goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12572863B2Work distribution platform with dynamic order-worker matching systems
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 SHIPT INC
  • US12572863B2 patent drawing
  • US12572863B2 patent drawing
  • US12572863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work distribution platform is disclosed that is coupled with client devices associated with workers. The work distribution may include matching systems to match workers with orders. An example matching system is a worker offering system, with which the work distribution platform provides orders to workers so that the workers may submit offers to perform the order. The work distribution platform may include a plurality of matching systems, each of which may perform a different process for matching orders with workers and each of which may be used by the work distribution platform.