Dynamic Origin-Destination Matrix Estimation for Multi-Goal Trips

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transportation forecasting systems fail to accurately generate origin-destination matrices, particularly in agglomeration areas with dense public transportation networks, as they struggle to account for multi-goal trips, leading to inaccurate evaluation and planning of transportation systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that dynamically updates origin-destination matrices by acquiring validation sequences from travelers, identifying subsequences as valid transfer trips, and recognizing multi-goal trips through intermediate destinations, incorporating this information to refine the matrices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If previous methods are used to generate origin-destination matrices from real-time information, then the matrices can be produced, but they fail to reproduce the observed traffic flows due to not accounting for multi-goal trips

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of origin-destination matrixVSAvoidability to account for multi-goal trips
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the trip identification process into multiple components: validating individual trip segments, identifying transfer trips, and detecting multi-goal trips. By dividing the complex origin-destination matrix generation into these manageable segments, the system can accurately reproduce observed traffic flows while accounting for multi-goal trips that previous methods missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the system tries to identify all possible trips including multi-goal trips, then the accuracy improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of traffic flow reproductionVSAvoidcomplexity of trip identification system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first validating individual trip segments before combining them into transfer trips and multi-goal trips. This step-by-step preliminary processing reduces system complexity by breaking down the identification task into manageable stages, where each stage builds upon the previous one, ultimately achieving accurate traffic flow reproduction without overwhelming computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If real-time information is used to generate dynamic origin-destination matrices, then the planning becomes more relevant, but the methods fail to identify transfer trips with multiple goals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of transportation planningVSAvoidinformation about multi-goal trips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using observed traffic flows to validate and refine the origin-destination matrix generation process. By comparing the generated matrices against actual observed traffic patterns, the system continuously improves its ability to identify multi-goal trips and transfer trips, ensuring that real-time information is effectively utilized while capturing the full complexity of traveler behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10430736B2System and method for estimating a dynamic origin-destination matrix
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
  • US10430736B2 patent drawing
  • US10430736B2 patent drawing
  • US10430736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system are disclosed for dynamically estimating an origin-destination matrix. An origin-destination matrix is initialized with a set of origin stops and destination stops. Validation sequences are acquired for a set of travelers on a transportation system which include a plurality of the origin stops and respective timestamps. Corresponding destination stops may be known or inferred. For each validation sequence, a set of subsequences is generated, each including a respective one of the origin stops and the associated timestamp. Subsequences which, in combination, constitute a valid transfer trip are identified. For a combination of subsequences constituting a valid transfer trip, the method includes determining whether the valid transfer trip is a multi-goal trip for which there is least a first destination stop with an intermediate goal and a second destination stop with a final goal. The origin-destination matrix is updated, based on the determination.