Dynamic Patent Document Generation via NLP Claim Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for generating formal documents, such as patent applications, are limited in their ability to rearrange and refine claim segments, leading to incomplete and inaccurate outputs due to their inability to disambiguate phrase meanings and represent complex relationships, resulting in insufficiently detailed and structured documents.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic user interface and improved natural language processing (NLP) analysis method that allows for the segmentation and reorganization of claim segments, enabling users to input additional context and disambiguate terms, thereby generating more comprehensive and accurate document drafts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing NLP systems process claim text automatically, then document generation speed is improved, but the accuracy and completeness of the generated document deteriorates due to inability to disambiguate phrase meanings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument generation speedVSAvoidphrase meaning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary human reviewer who acts as a mediator between the automated NLP system and the final document. The NLP system processes claims to generate initial document drafts, but a human reviewer then reviews and disambiguates phrase meanings, ensuring accuracy while maintaining the efficiency benefits of automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the document generation process into distinct phases: automated NLP processing of claims, human review of generated content, and iterative refinement. This segmentation allows each component to specialize - the NLP system handles speed-intensive tasks while human reviewers focus on accuracy-critical disambiguation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If existing systems generate documents using generic templates, then ease of operation is improved, but the adaptability to specific client requirements and complex relationships deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument generation simplicityVSAvoidclient requirement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic document generation system that adapts to client-specific requirements. Rather than using fixed generic templates, the system dynamically adjusts the generated document based on the specific claims provided and client preferences, allowing flexibility while maintaining ease of operation through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different sections of the generated document to have different levels of customization. Generic templates provide the overall structure for ease of operation, while specific sections can be tailored to client requirements and complex relationships identified in the claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If existing NLP systems process claims in a single pass, then processing time is reduced, but the ability to represent complex relationships and rearrange claim segments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidcomplex relationship representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action through multi-pass processing of the claims. The NLP system processes claims in multiple iterations, with each pass focusing on different aspects such as initial extraction, relationship identification, and refinement. This periodic processing maintains reasonable time efficiency while progressively building a comprehensive representation of complex relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing initial claim segmentation and relationship identification in early processing passes, preparing the data structure for more complex analysis in subsequent passes. This preliminary organization of information enables efficient handling of complex relationships without requiring excessive processing time in later stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230222286A1Dynamically generating documents using natural language processing and dynamic user interface
Publication Date: 2023.07.13 ROWAN TELS CORP
  • US20230222286A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222286A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222286A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An NLP analysis method based on identification of common terms is disclosed. The improved NLP analysis can separate different parts of a patent claim into discrete claim segments based on the common terms. A user interface that corresponds to a flowchart allows the user to drag and drop the claim segments to form complex relationships, which is used to generate a patent specification.