Dynamic Personal Data Ranking via Usage Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current personal data management systems, such as address books and financial portfolios, require manual updates and maintenance, which is time-consuming and cumbersome, and lack efficient methods for automatically generating and ranking relevant data based on user needs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that dynamically ranks personal data entries by assigning ranking signals based on metadata, usage, and context, allowing for automatic generation and maintenance of personal data books, such as address books, using structured search data and browsing activity, and storing these entries with associated signals for future updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual updates and maintenance are used for personal data, then data accuracy can be maintained, but user time and effort are significantly consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoiduser time and effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates and maintains personal data by monitoring user's browsing activity, email interactions, and search queries. The address book, stock portfolio, and other personal data are updated without user intervention, with the system self-managing data collection, validation, and storage operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user interactions with data (viewing, editing, searching) and uses this feedback to dynamically rank and prioritize data entries. This feedback loop ensures that frequently accessed or important data is maintained with higher accuracy while reducing manual maintenance burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If personal data is manually maintained, then data privacy and control can be ensured, but the process becomes cumbersome and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacy and controlVSAvoiddata maintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects data from public sources and user interactions without requiring manual input. Users simply benefit from the automated maintenance while retaining control through selective viewing and editing capabilities, thus improving productivity without sacrificing privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between various data sources (browsers, emails, search engines) and the user's personal data storage. It automatically processes and validates data through this intermediary layer, ensuring privacy control while eliminating cumbersome manual maintenance processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If personal data entries are stored in alphabetical order, then data organization is simple, but accessing specific data becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata organization simplicityVSAvoiddata access time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reorganizes data entries based on multiple factors including frequency of access, recency of updates, user preferences, and contextual relevance. This dynamic ranking transforms static alphabetical ordering into an adaptive structure that automatically optimizes access time while maintaining organizational simplicity through automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-ranks data entries based on historical usage patterns and metadata before user queries are submitted. By performing this ranking action in advance, the system prepares data in an optimal access order, significantly reducing retrieval time while keeping the organizational mechanism simple and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive personal data is automatically collected, then data relevance and usefulness are improved, but privacy concerns and data security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata relevance and usefulnessVSAvoidprivacy concerns and security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects data through intermediary processes that automatically filter and validate information from multiple sources before storing in personal data books. This intermediary layer ensures comprehensive data collection for relevance while implementing security checks and privacy protections, reducing security risks through automated validation and controlled data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9262446B1Dynamically ranking entries in a personal data book
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9262446B1 patent drawing
  • US9262446B1 patent drawing
  • US9262446B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for automatically generating and maintaining personal data, such as an address book, a financial portfolio, a discussion groups or blogs book, or other types of personal data stores, based on a person's structured search data and/or usage data (e.g., browsing) and/or other sources of personal data (e.g., emails the user receives). Related metadata can also be used in the generating and/or maintaining of the personal data. Dynamic personal data ranking and/or autocomplete functions are also provided, which can be used in conjunction with the automatic generation and maintenance of the user's personal data, to further ease the user's burden in managing and/or handling such data.