Dynamic Physical Data Transfer Routing via Hybrid Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transfer of large amounts of data presents technical and logistical challenges, particularly when customers with limited network connectivity need to store data with a computing resource service provider.

Innovation Solution

The system employs dynamic physical data transfer routing by using a physical storage device equipped with an electronic shipping label, which is programmed with route information. This allows data to be transferred efficiently by shipping the physical storage device through various physical and network paths, optimizing for factors like latency, shipping time, and data center capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If data is transferred over network paths, then data transfer can be performed remotely, but transfer time increases and network capacity is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer timeVSAvoidnetwork transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The data transfer process is segmented into two distinct paths: a control plane that operates over network paths for routing decisions, and a data plane that uses physical path transportation for actual data movement. This segmentation allows the system to optimize each path for its specific function, reducing overall transfer time while maintaining network efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A physical storage device acts as an intermediary between the customer site and the data center. The device is shipped physically to transfer large amounts of data, bypassing network bandwidth limitations. The intermediary enables hybrid transfer by combining physical transportation with network-based control and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple network paths are available for data transfer, then routing flexibility increases, but path selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting path flexibilityVSAvoidpath selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system dynamically selects between physical and network paths based on real-time conditions such as data size, urgency, and resource availability. The route determination is not static but adapts to changing conditions, optimizing the transfer path while managing complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines the optimal route without requiring manual intervention. The routing engine self-manages the complexity of path selection by evaluating multiple factors and making decisions autonomously, reducing the perceived complexity for users while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If physical storage devices are used for data transfer, then transfer speed increases for large data volumes, but logistics complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer speedVSAvoidlogistics coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges physical path transportation with network path operations into a unified hybrid transfer process. The physical storage device transfer is coordinated with network-based control signals and routing decisions, creating an integrated system that leverages the speed of physical transfer while managing logistics through network coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The physical storage device serves multiple functions: it acts as both the data carrier for high-speed transfer and as a trigger for initiating and coordinating the transfer process through its electronic shipping label. This multi-functionality reduces logistics complexity by consolidating several operations into a single actionable component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Extent of automation

If electronic shipping labels are programmed with route information, then automated routing is enabled, but label system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting automation levelVSAvoidelectronic label complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Route information is pre-programmed into the electronic shipping label before the physical storage device is shipped. This preliminary action enables automated routing decisions to be made at the destination without requiring real-time computation or complex processing during the transfer, simplifying the label system while maintaining high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The routing logic is extracted from the physical storage device and embedded in the electronic shipping label system. This separation allows the label to handle routing complexity independently, enabling automated routing without increasing the complexity of the storage device itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12333481B1Dynamic physical data transfer routing
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12333481B1 patent drawing
  • US12333481B1 patent drawing
  • US12333481B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described herein for routing data by transferring a physical storage device for at least part of a route between source and destination locations. In one example, a computing resource service provider, may receive a request to transfer data from a customer center to a data center. The service provider may determine a route, which includes one or more of a physical path or a network path, for the data loaded onto a physical storage device to reach the data center from the customer center. Determining the route may include associating respective cost values to individual physical and network paths between physical stations between the customer and end data centers, and selecting one or more of the paths to reduce a total cost of the route. Route information may then be associated with the physical storage device based on the route.