Dynamic PID Tuning for Stable Chemical Process Set-Point Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional process controllers in petroleum processing and chemical production face challenges such as overcorrection and instability due to long lag times and complex interactions between control variables, leading to difficulties in maintaining control variables at desired set points.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a modified proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller with dynamic tuning logic that adjusts integral coefficients based on a reasonable progress curve, reducing the weighting of the integral term when the control variable is returning to the set point at a desired rate, thereby minimizing overshooting and instability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional PID controllers are used with fixed integral coefficients, then the controller structure is simple and easy to operate, but the control precision deteriorates due to overcorrection and instability from long lag times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic tuning logic that continuously adjusts the integral coefficient based on the detected progress toward the set point. The controller transitions from fixed coefficients to dynamic coefficients that adapt in real-time, resolving the contradiction by making the controller structure flexible rather than static, thereby improving control precision without requiring a complete redesign of the system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of the integral coefficient from a fixed value to a dynamically variable parameter. By monitoring the progress curve and adjusting the integral coefficient accordingly (increasing it when progress is slow, decreasing it when progress is adequate), the system achieves higher control precision while maintaining reasonable operational complexity through parameter adaptation rather than structural overhaul

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the integral term weighting is increased to respond faster to deviations, then the response speed improves, but stability deteriorates due to overcorrection and oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the integral coefficient parameter based on the detected progress toward the set point. When progress is slow, the coefficient is increased to accelerate response; when progress is adequate, the coefficient is decreased to prevent overcorrection. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the response aggressiveness to the actual process state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback logic that continuously monitors the progress curve and uses this information to adjust the integral coefficient. The feedback mechanism detects whether the control variable is making reasonable progress toward the set point and adjusts the controller gain accordingly, thereby maintaining stability while achieving fast response when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If dynamic tuning logic is implemented to adjust coefficients based on progress curve, then control precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds dynamic tuning logic that adjusts coefficients based on the progress curve, improving control precision by adapting to process conditions. The complexity increase is managed by implementing the logic as a software module that monitors progress and adjusts parameters, rather than requiring complex hardware modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes fixed controller parameters to dynamic parameters that adapt based on process progress. This approach improves precision by allowing parameter optimization during operation while keeping the overall device structure relatively simple, as the complexity is confined to the parameter adjustment logic rather than the entire control system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11097244B2Dynamic tuning logic for petroleum processing and chemical production
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO
  • US11097244B2 patent drawing
  • US11097244B2 patent drawing
  • US11097244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for controlling chemical production and/or petroleum processing reaction systems to allow for improved control of control variables relative to desired set points. The improved control can be achieved by use of a modified proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller or a similar type of controller that includes dynamic tuning logic. The modified PID controller can be operated using different coefficients based on the relative values of a control variable and a reasonable progress curve determined based on the values of the control variable.