Dynamic Polymer Surfaces for Enzyme-Free Cell Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell therapy processing faces challenges in scaling up or scaling out biomanufacturing for allogenic and autologous cell therapies due to issues with cell harvesting and sorting, particularly the damage caused by enzymatic methods like trypsinization and the inefficiency of non-enzymatic methods such as EDTA, as well as the need for effective screening and enrichment of rare cells without damaging reagents.

Innovation Solution

Dynamic polymer surfaces with alternating micropatterns of adhesive and repulsive domains that change in response to environmental stimuli, allowing for non-enzymatic detachment and enrichment of cells through controlled mechanical forces, enabling efficient cell growth, harvesting, and sorting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If enzymatic methods like trypsinization are used for cell detachment, then cell harvesting efficiency is improved, but cell damage and toxicity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell harvesting efficiencyVSAvoidcell damage and toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces enzymatic detachment with a mechanical system based on dynamic polymer surfaces that undergo reversible conformational changes in response to environmental stimuli (temperature, pH, ionic strength). The polymer brush transitions from an extended state (providing mechanical detachment force) to a collapsed state (reducing adhesion), enabling enzyme-free cell release while maintaining cell viability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in environmental parameters (temperature, pH, ionic strength) to trigger reversible conformational changes in the polymer brush. By adjusting these parameters, the polymer transitions between extended and collapsed states, dynamically controlling cell adhesion and detachment without enzymatic intervention, thus avoiding cell damage while maintaining harvesting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If non-enzymatic methods such as EDTA are used for cell harvesting, then cell damage is reduced, but harvesting efficacy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell damageVSAvoidharvesting efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces weak chemical detachment methods like EDTA with a mechanical system based on dynamic polymer surfaces. The polymer brush provides controlled mechanical forces through conformational changes, enabling effective cell detachment without the limitations of chelating agents, thus achieving both low cell damage and high harvesting efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite surface structure combining adhesive domains (for cell attachment) and stimuli-responsive repulsive domains (for controlled detachment). This composite material approach allows independent optimization of cell adhesion strength and detachment efficiency, overcoming the limitations of single-function surfaces used with EDTA or other non-enzymatic methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If conventional cell culture surfaces are used, then cell growth is supported, but cell sorting and enrichment capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell growthVSAvoidcell sorting and enrichment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cell culture surface into distinct functional domains: adhesive domains that support cell growth and stimuli-responsive repulsive domains that enable controlled detachment. This segmentation allows the surface to perform multiple functions - supporting cell proliferation while providing on-demand cell release capability for harvesting and sorting applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms a static cell culture surface into a dynamic one by incorporating stimuli-responsive polymer brushes that can change their conformation and adhesive properties in response to environmental cues. This dynamic behavior enables the surface to adapt between cell growth mode (adhesive) and cell harvesting mode (repulsive), providing versatility for both cell culture and sorting/enrichment applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If static polymer surfaces are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but independent adjustment of adhesive and repulsive properties is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface fabricationVSAvoidindependent adjustment of adhesive and repulsive properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the polymer surface into distinct adhesive and stimuli-responsive repulsive domains, each with independent functional properties. This segmentation is achieved through controlled polymerization techniques that can selectively place different polymer brushes in specific spatial patterns, enabling independent tuning of adhesion and detachment properties while maintaining a relatively simple overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions with different polymer compositions and properties within the same surface. The adhesive domains have optimized cell-binding characteristics while the repulsive domains have stimuli-responsive characteristics, allowing each region to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dynamic polymer surfaces effectively detach cells without causing damage, allowing for high efficiency and safety in cell harvesting and enrichment, overcoming the limitations of existing methods by adjusting adhesive and repulsive properties independently and maintaining cell viability.

Implementation Method 1

the repulsive domains including one or more second polymer structures that change form a retracted conformation to a swollen conformation in response to an environmental stimulus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnvironmental stimulus-responsive conformational change:

Implementation Method 2

thereby physically contacting and exerting a mechanical force on particles adhered to the adhesive domains sufficient to detach a portion of particles from the adhesive domains

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20220135923A1Dynamic polymer surfaces for screening, enrichment, and harvesting of cells and other soft colloidal particles
Publication Date: 2022.05.05 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US20220135923A1 patent drawing
  • US20220135923A1 patent drawing
  • US20220135923A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic polymer surfaces are provided that include alternating micropatterns of adhesive domains and environmental stimuli-responsive repulsive domains, where application of a select environmental stimulus activates polymer structures of the repulsive domains to change conformation with respect to the adhesive domains. The dynamic polymer surfaces are useful for sorting, screening, and enriching target particles (such as cells) in a sample and for culturing and harvesting cells. Products, such as cell culture systems, including the dynamic polymer surfaces are also provided.